000915908 001__ 915908
000915908 005__ 20230123110758.0
000915908 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119636
000915908 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1053-8119
000915908 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-9572
000915908 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/33058
000915908 0247_ $$2pmid$$a36116616
000915908 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000870701300005
000915908 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-05777
000915908 082__ $$a610
000915908 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aOoi, Leon Qi Rong$$b0
000915908 245__ $$aComparison of individualized behavioral predictions across anatomical, diffusion and functional connectivity MRI
000915908 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2022
000915908 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000915908 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000915908 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1670912818_31169
000915908 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000915908 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000915908 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000915908 520__ $$aA fundamental goal across the neurosciences is the characterization of relationships linking brain anatomy, functioning, and behavior. Although various MRI modalities have been developed to probe these relationships, direct comparisons of their ability to predict behavior have been lacking. Here, we compared the ability of anatomical T1, diffusion and functional MRI (fMRI) to predict behavior at an individual level. Cortical thickness, area and volume were extracted from anatomical T1 images. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and approximate Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) models were fitted to the diffusion images. The resulting metrics were projected to the Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) skeleton. We also ran probabilistic tractography for the diffusion images, from which we extracted the stream count, average stream length, and the average of each DTI and NODDI metric across tracts connecting each pair of brain regions. Functional connectivity (FC) was extracted from both task and resting-state fMRI. Individualized prediction of a wide range of behavioral measures were performed using kernel ridge regression, linear ridge regression and elastic net regression. Consistency of the results were investigated with the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) datasets. In both datasets, FC-based models gave the best prediction performance, regardless of regression model or behavioral measure. This was especially true for the cognitive component. Furthermore, all modalities were able to predict cognition better than other behavioral components. Combining all modalities improved prediction of cognition, but not other behavioral components. Finally, across all behaviors, combining resting and task FC yielded prediction performance similar to combining all modalities. Overall, our study suggests that in the case of healthy children and young adults, behaviorally-relevant information in T1 and diffusion features might reflect a subset of the variance captured by FC.
000915908 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000915908 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChen, Jianzhong$$b1
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhang, Shaoshi$$b2
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKong, Ru$$b3
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTam, Angela$$b4
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)164828$$aLi, Jingwei$$b5$$ufzj
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDhamala, Elvisha$$b6
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhou, Juan Helen$$b7
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHolmes, Avram J$$b8
000915908 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aYeo, B. T. Thomas$$b9$$eCorresponding author
000915908 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119636$$gVol. 263, p. 119636 -$$p119636 -$$tNeuroImage$$v263$$x1053-8119$$y2022
000915908 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/915908/files/1-s2.0-S1053811922007510-main.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000915908 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:915908$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000915908 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)164828$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000915908 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)164828$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b5
000915908 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$a National University of Singapore$$b9
000915908 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000915908 9141_ $$y2022
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2021$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-09-27T20:29:23Z
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-09-27T20:29:23Z
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2021$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2022-11-12$$wger
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-12
000915908 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2022-09-27T20:29:23Z
000915908 920__ $$lyes
000915908 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000915908 980__ $$ajournal
000915908 980__ $$aVDB
000915908 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000915908 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000915908 9801_ $$aFullTexts