% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ooi:915908,
author = {Ooi, Leon Qi Rong and Chen, Jianzhong and Zhang, Shaoshi
and Kong, Ru and Tam, Angela and Li, Jingwei and Dhamala,
Elvisha and Zhou, Juan Helen and Holmes, Avram J and Yeo, B.
T. Thomas},
title = {{C}omparison of individualized behavioral predictions
across anatomical, diffusion and functional connectivity
{MRI}},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {263},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-05777},
pages = {119636 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {A fundamental goal across the neurosciences is the
characterization of relationships linking brain anatomy,
functioning, and behavior. Although various MRI modalities
have been developed to probe these relationships, direct
comparisons of their ability to predict behavior have been
lacking. Here, we compared the ability of anatomical T1,
diffusion and functional MRI (fMRI) to predict behavior at
an individual level. Cortical thickness, area and volume
were extracted from anatomical T1 images. Diffusion Tensor
Imaging (DTI) and approximate Neurite Orientation Dispersion
and Density Imaging (NODDI) models were fitted to the
diffusion images. The resulting metrics were projected to
the Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) skeleton. We also
ran probabilistic tractography for the diffusion images,
from which we extracted the stream count, average stream
length, and the average of each DTI and NODDI metric across
tracts connecting each pair of brain regions. Functional
connectivity (FC) was extracted from both task and
resting-state fMRI. Individualized prediction of a wide
range of behavioral measures were performed using kernel
ridge regression, linear ridge regression and elastic net
regression. Consistency of the results were investigated
with the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and Adolescent Brain
Cognitive Development (ABCD) datasets. In both datasets,
FC-based models gave the best prediction performance,
regardless of regression model or behavioral measure. This
was especially true for the cognitive component.
Furthermore, all modalities were able to predict cognition
better than other behavioral components. Combining all
modalities improved prediction of cognition, but not other
behavioral components. Finally, across all behaviors,
combining resting and task FC yielded prediction performance
similar to combining all modalities. Overall, our study
suggests that in the case of healthy children and young
adults, behaviorally-relevant information in T1 and
diffusion features might reflect a subset of the variance
captured by FC.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {36116616},
UT = {WOS:000870701300005},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119636},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/915908},
}