Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Stomatal conductance tracks soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in faba bean and maize during soil drying > print

001     915954
005     20230125125735.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/plphys/kiac422
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0032-0889
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1532-2548
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/33173
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 36099023
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000862628300001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-05811
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Müllers, Yannik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)176476
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Stomatal conductance tracks soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance in faba bean and maize during soil drying
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|c 2022
|b Oxford University Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1674463526_20587
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Although regulation of stomatal conductance is widely assumed to be the most important plant response to soil drying, the picture is incomplete when hydraulic conductance from soil to the leaf, upstream of the stomata, is not considered. Here, we investigated to what extent soil drying reduces the conductance between soil and leaf, whether this reduction differs between species, how it affects stomatal regulation, and where in the hydraulic pathway it occurs. To this end, we noninvasively and continuously measured the total root water uptake rate, soil water potential, leaf water potential, and stomatal conductance of 4-week-old, pot-grown maize (Zea mays) and faba bean (Vicia faba) plants during 4 days of water restriction. In both species, the soil–plant conductance, excluding stomatal conductance, declined exponentially with soil drying and was reduced to 50% above a soil water potential of −0.1 MPa, which is far from the permanent wilting point. This loss of conductance has immediate consequences for leaf water potential and the associated stomatal regulation. Both stomatal conductance and soil–plant conductance declined at a higher rate in faba bean than in maize. Estimations of the water potential at the root surface and an incomplete recovery 22 h after rewatering indicate that the loss of conductance, at least partly, occurred inside the plants, for example, through root suberization or altered aquaporin gene expression. Our findings suggest that differences in the stomatal sensitivity among plant species are partly explained by the sensitivity of root hydraulic conductance to soil drying.
536 _ _ |a 2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
650 2 7 |a Biology
|0 V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-160
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Postma, Johannes A
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Poorter, Hendrik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|b 2
700 1 _ |a van Dusschoten, Dagmar
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129425
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/plphys/kiac422
|g Vol. 190, no. 4, p. 2279 - 2294
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2004346-6
|n 4
|p 2279 - 2294
|t Plant physiology
|v 190
|y 2022
|x 0032-0889
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/915954/files/Invoice_E15541959.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/915954/files/kiac422.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:915954
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)176476
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129425
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PLANT PHYSIOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b PLANT PHYSIOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-17
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21