001     916035
005     20231027114349.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/brain/awac335
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0006-8950
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1460-2156
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/33660
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 36097353
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000892013000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-05881
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Amiri, Moshgan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Multimodal prediction of residual consciousness in the intensive care unit: the CONNECT-ME study
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|c 2023
|b Oxford Univ. Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1673957512_27886
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Functional MRI (fMRI) and EEG may reveal residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), as reflected by a rapidly expanding literature on chronic DoC. However, acute DoC is rarely investigated, although identifying residual consciousness is key to clinical decision-making in the intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, the objective of the prospective, observational, tertiary centre cohort, diagnostic phase IIb study ‘Consciousness in neurocritical care cohort study using EEG and fMRI’ (CONNECT-ME, NCT02644265) was to assess the accuracy of fMRI and EEG to identify residual consciousness in acute DoC in the ICU. Between April 2016 and November 2020, 87 acute DoC patients with traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury were examined with repeated clinical assessments, fMRI and EEG. Resting-state EEG and EEG with external stimulations were evaluated by visual analysis, spectral band analysis and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) consciousness classifier. In addition, within- and between-network resting-state connectivity for canonical resting-state fMRI networks was assessed. Next, we used EEG and fMRI data at study enrolment in two different machine-learning algorithms (Random Forest and SVM with a linear kernel) to distinguish patients in a minimally conscious state or better (≥MCS) from those in coma or unresponsive wakefulness state (≤UWS) at time of study enrolment and at ICU discharge (or before death). Prediction performances were assessed with area under the curve (AUC). Of 87 DoC patients (mean age, 50.0 ± 18 years, 43% female), 51 (59%) were ≤UWS and 36 (41%) were ≥ MCS at study enrolment. Thirty-one (36%) patients died in the ICU, including 28 who had life-sustaining therapy withdrawn. EEG and fMRI predicted consciousness levels at study enrolment and ICU discharge, with maximum AUCs of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.80) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.77–0.80), respectively. Models based on combined EEG and fMRI features predicted consciousness levels at study enrolment and ICU discharge with maximum AUCs of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.86) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.89), respectively, with improved positive predictive value and sensitivity. Overall, both machine-learning algorithms (SVM and Random Forest) performed equally well. In conclusion, we suggest that acute DoC prediction models in the ICU be based on a combination of fMRI and EEG features, regardless of the machine-learning algorithm used.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Fisher, Patrick M
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Raimondo, Federico
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)185083
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Sidaros, Annette
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Hribljan, Melita Cacic
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Othman, Marwan H
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Zibrandtsen, Ivan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Albrechtsen, Simon S
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Bergdal, Ove
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Hansen, Adam Espe
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Hassager, Christian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Højgaard, Joan Lilja S
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Jakobsen, Elisabeth Waldemar
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Jensen, Helene Ravnholt
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Møller, Jacob
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Nersesjan, Vardan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Nikolic, Miki
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Olsen, Markus Harboe
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Sigurdsson, Sigurdur Thor
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Sitt, Jacobo D
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Sølling, Christine
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Welling, Karen Lise
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Willumsen, Lisette M
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 22
700 1 _ |a Hauerberg, John
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 23
700 1 _ |a Larsen, Vibeke Andrée
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 24
700 1 _ |a Fabricius, Martin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 25
700 1 _ |a Knudsen, Gitte Moos
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 26
700 1 _ |a Kjaergaard, Jesper
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 27
700 1 _ |a Møller, Kirsten
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 28
700 1 _ |a Kondziella, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 29
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/brain/awac335
|g p. awac335
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1474117-9
|n 1
|p 50-64
|t Brain
|v 146
|y 2023
|x 0006-8950
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/916035/files/awac335.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:916035
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)185083
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)185083
910 1 _ |a Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital , Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen , Denmark
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 29
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-21
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BRAIN : 2022
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-10-21
915 _ _ |a IF >= 10
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910
|2 StatID
|b BRAIN : 2022
|d 2023-10-21
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21