001     916058
005     20250516103604.0
024 7 _ |2 datacite_doi
|a 10.34734/FZJ-2022-05904
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-05904
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 650
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)133831
|a Tunger, Dirk
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Altmetrics as Additional Indicators for Analyzing Research Efficiency of Universities? : A Conceptual and Empirical Study
260 _ _ |a München
|b GBI-Genios Deutsche Wirtschaftsdatenbank GmbH
|c 2022
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1695193893_11661
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a The academic literature provides a variety of empirical studies measuring the research efficiency of universities. The indicators used are mainly bibliometric values, which are intended to quantify the dissemination and impact of university research in the scientific community. Further objectives of a university's management related to research activities thatrefer to other stakeholders such as the interested public are typically not addressed in these studies. Against this background, the question arises whether altmetrics are suitable for quantifying such neglected objectives in order to be used as additional indicators in multidimensional efficiency analyses. Based on a framework built on fundamentals of decision theory, the paper conceptually addresses this question by discussing the potential of altmetrics to quantify research objectives. It turns out that only few altmetrics actually meet essential measurement requirements. The remaining altmetrics are then used in an empirical study to investigate their impact on research efficiency of three different research fields by means of Data Envelopment Analysis. It is shown that the inclusion of altmetrics, ceterisparibus, does not lead to any signifi cant changes in the ranking positions of the universities under consideration.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Ahn, Heinz
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Clermont, Marcel
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Krolak, Johanna
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Langner, J.
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)133810
|a Mittermaier, Bernhard
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2209448-9
|n 3
|p 262-280
|t Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis
|v 74
|x 0006-002X
|y 2022
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/916058/files/Altmetrics%20as%20Additional%20Indicators.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:916058
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)133831
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 3
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)133810
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 5
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b BETRIEB FORSCH PRAX : 2019
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|a IF < 5
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2021-01-27
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406
|k ZB
|l Zentralbibliothek
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21