% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Ganesh:916178,
author = {Ganesh, Vishnu and Dorow-Gerspach, Daniel and Matejicek,
Jiri and Vilemova, Monika and Bram, Martin and Coenen, Jan
Willem and Wirtz, Marius and Pintsuk, Gerald and Theisen,
Werner and Linsmeier, Christian},
title = {{H}igh heat flux testing results of various {W}-{FGM}-steel
joints},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-05998},
year = {2022},
abstract = {For a future commercial fusion reactor the First Wall of
the breeding blanket will require a joint between the
structural steel and the plasma facing material tungsten.
However, the difference in the coefficient of thermal
expansion (CTE) between them results in thermal stresses at
their interface during operation and this could result in
premature failure of the joint. A functionally graded
material (FGM), as an interlayer between tungsten and steel
could reduce these stresses. In this study two processes,
atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) and spark plasma sintering
(SPS), are utilized to manufacture four different kinds of
W-FGM-steel stacks: the first two include FGMs prepared by
APS; W-V-75W-50W-25W-steel and W-50W-25W-steel, the other
two include FGMs made by SPS; W-75W-50W-25W-steel and
W-50W-25W-steel. This investigates: i) the influence of an
additional V-interlayer; ii) the comparison of APS- and
SPS-FGMs; and iii) the influence of FGM composition and
thickness. In all these W-FGM-steel stacks, with a surface
area of 12 mm x 12 mm, the thickness of each FGM sublayer
(75W, 50W, 25W) is about 0.5 mm, whereas the bulk-W and
bulk-steel are 3 mm thick. A sample of direct diffusion
bonded W-steel joint is used as a reference. A high heat
flux benchmark test was performed to investigate and compare
the potential of the different joining technologies. For
this, the stacks were soldered on a copper cooling module
and exposed to high stationary loads at the JUDITH-2
facility. At each power level of 1 MW/m2, 2 MW/m2, 3 MW/m2
and 4 MW/m2 the samples were subjected to a component
screening cycle to determine the component quality followed
by up to 200 on/off cycles (30/30 s). By monitoring the
surface temperature using an IR camera, the cooling
capabilities of each sample and any local overheating as
indication of bond failure can be determined.},
month = {Sep},
date = {2022-09-18},
organization = {32nd Symposium on Fusion Technology,
Dubrovnik (Croatia), 18 Sep 2022 - 24
Sep 2022},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {IEK-4},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
pnm = {133 - Technologien und Materialien für die Fusion
(POF4-133)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-133},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/916178},
}