% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Saalasti:916664,
      author       = {Saalasti, Satu and Alho, Jussi and Lahnakoski, Juha M. and
                      Bacha-Trams, Mareike and Glerean, Enrico and
                      Jääskeläinen, Iiro P. and Hasson, Uri and Sams, Mikko},
      title        = {{L}ipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female
                      population: {N}eural characteristics shared with listening
                      and reading},
      journal      = {Brain and behavior},
      volume       = {13},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {2162-3279},
      address      = {Malden, Mass.},
      publisher    = {Wiley},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2023-00016},
      pages        = {e2869},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {IntroductionFew of us are skilled lipreaders while most
                      struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable
                      comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are
                      not yet well understood.MethodsWe used a data-driven
                      approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading
                      of an 8-min narrative with participants whose lipreading
                      skills varied extensively (range $6–100\%,$
                      $mean = 50.7\%).$ The participants also listened to and
                      read the same narrative. The similarity between individual
                      participants’ brain activity during the whole narrative,
                      within and between conditions, was estimated by a voxel-wise
                      comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent
                      (BOLD) signal time courses.ResultsInter-subject correlation
                      (ISC) of the time courses revealed that lipreading,
                      listening to, and reading the narrative were largely
                      supported by the same brain areas in the temporal, parietal
                      and frontal cortices, precuneus, and cerebellum.
                      Additionally, listening to and reading connected
                      naturalistic speech particularly activated higher-level
                      linguistic processing in the parietal and frontal cortices
                      more consistently than lipreading, probably paralleling the
                      limited understanding obtained via lip-reading. Importantly,
                      higher lipreading test score and subjective estimate of
                      comprehension of the lipread narrative was associated with
                      activity in the superior and middle temporal
                      cortex.ConclusionsOur new data illustrates that findings
                      from prior studies using well-controlled repetitive speech
                      stimuli and stimulus-driven data analyses are also valid for
                      naturalistic connected speech. Our results might suggest
                      an efficient use of brain areas dealing with phonological
                      processing in skilled lipreaders},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {36579557},
      UT           = {WOS:000905489800001},
      doi          = {10.1002/brb3.2869},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/916664},
}