001     916664
005     20231027114350.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/brb3.2869
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/34032
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 36579557
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000905489800001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-00016
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Saalasti, Satu
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
260 _ _ |a Malden, Mass.
|c 2023
|b Wiley
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1677568854_4770
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a IntroductionFew of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood.MethodsWe used a data-driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8-min narrative with participants whose lipreading skills varied extensively (range 6–100%, mean = 50.7%). The participants also listened to and read the same narrative. The similarity between individual participants’ brain activity during the whole narrative, within and between conditions, was estimated by a voxel-wise comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal time courses.ResultsInter-subject correlation (ISC) of the time courses revealed that lipreading, listening to, and reading the narrative were largely supported by the same brain areas in the temporal, parietal and frontal cortices, precuneus, and cerebellum. Additionally, listening to and reading connected naturalistic speech particularly activated higher-level linguistic processing in the parietal and frontal cortices more consistently than lipreading, probably paralleling the limited understanding obtained via lip-reading. Importantly, higher lipreading test score and subjective estimate of comprehension of the lipread narrative was associated with activity in the superior and middle temporal cortex.ConclusionsOur new data illustrates that findings from prior studies using well-controlled repetitive speech stimuli and stimulus-driven data analyses are also valid for naturalistic connected speech. Our results might suggest an efficient use of brain areas dealing with phonological processing in skilled lipreaders
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Alho, Jussi
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lahnakoski, Juha M.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)179423
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Bacha-Trams, Mareike
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Glerean, Enrico
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Jääskeläinen, Iiro P.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Hasson, Uri
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Sams, Mikko
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/brb3.2869
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2623587-0
|n 2
|p e2869
|t Brain and behavior
|v 13
|y 2023
|x 2162-3279
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/916664/files/Brain%20and%20Behavior%20-%202022%20-%20Saalasti%20-%20Lipreading%20a%20naturalistic%20narrative%20in%20a%20female%20population%20Neural%20characteristics-1.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:916664
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)179423
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-04-16T15:13:12Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-04-16T15:13:12Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2021-04-16T15:13:12Z
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BRAIN BEHAV : 2022
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-10-26
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-26
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21