% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Keller:916936,
author = {Keller, Nora and Bol, Roland and Herre, Michael and
Marschner, Bernd and Heinze, Stefanie},
title = {{C}atchment scale spatial distribution of soil enzyme
activities in a mountainous {G}erman coniferous forest},
journal = {Soil biology $\&$ biochemistry},
volume = {177},
issn = {0038-0717},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-00203},
pages = {108885 -},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Topography features within catchments influence soil
properties, nutrient status, microbial dynamics and
ultimately enzyme activities. Extracellular soil enzymes are
essential for the decomposition of organic substrates and
play a central role in global biogeochemical cycles. How
topography and soil properties drive the spatial expression
of enzyme activities at the catchment scale is still
underexplored, especially in coniferous forest ecosystems.
This study investigated the activity of four extracellular
soil enzymes: β-glucosidase (β-glu), β-cellobiosidase
(β-cello), acid phosphatase (pho) and
leucine-aminopeptidase (l-leu) in Oh and Ah horizons of a
(27 ha) mountainous coniferous forest catchment
(Wüstebach, Eifel National Park, Germany). Spatial patterns
and "hot spots" of activities of these four enzymes
(involved in C-,N-, and P- cycling) were examined in
connection to catchment units differing in slope, exposure
and soil type (Cambisol vs. Gleysol), and multiple soil
parameters (i.e., moisture content, pH, C, N, P, K, Fe, Mn
content, C:N, C:P and N:P ratio). Catchment enzyme
activities were overall, except for β-cello, significantly
higher in the Oh than Ah horizon. Lower β-glu, and l-leu
activities were found where more anaerobic soil conditions
did occur, e.g., the river valleys (RV). Neither enhanced Oh
horizon erosion on steeper Eastern (ES) and Northeastern
(NES) slopes nor larger spatial soil nutrients heterogeneity
on Northern (NS) and Western (WS) slopes, did significantly
affect enzyme activity. Landscape topography did lead to a
spatial variation of the activity of the four enzymes
examined. The site-specific variation in C-cycling enzymes
(β-glu and β-cello) was most marked at drier East,
Northeast and Northern slopes, for P-cycling (pho) within
the central wetter river valley but was for N-cycling
(l-leu) enzyme activity more homogeneously distributed over
the whole catchment. Overall, enzyme activities were
strongly correlated to soil properties (especially soil
moisture and organic carbon), but locations NS (Wüstebach
source area) and RV (Wüstebach river flow path) showed less
site-specific correlations. Further refinement of
site-specific soil and external factors driving spatial
distribution of enzyme activities at catchment scales and
beyond will help to further tool up this research at larger
spatial scales.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000903499300002},
doi = {10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108885},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/916936},
}