% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Li:917280,
      author       = {Li, Wanxin and Hendricks-Franssen, Harrie-Jan and Brunner,
                      Philip and Li, Zhi and Wang, Zhoufeng and Wang, Yike and
                      Wang, Wenke},
      title        = {{T}he role of soil texture on diurnal and seasonal cycles
                      of potential evaporation over saturated bare soils –
                      {L}ysimeter studies},
      journal      = {Journal of hydrology},
      volume       = {613},
      issn         = {0022-1694},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2023-00510},
      pages        = {128194 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Calculating actual bare soil evaporation (Ea) based on
                      potential evaporation (PE) is a widely followed approach in
                      many disciplines such as hydrogeology, hydrology and
                      agricultural sciences. The influence of soil texture on PE
                      is rarely considered in these approaches. In this work,
                      seasonal and diurnal cycles of PE over saturated bare soils
                      were assessed using a unique lysimeter experiment in the
                      Guanzhong Basin, China. The assessment was made for three
                      different soil textures including fine sand (PEfine), coarse
                      sand (PEcoarse) and gravel (PEgravel). Meteorological
                      variables, soil heat flux and soil temperatures were
                      measured at a high temporal resolution for more than 14
                      consecutive months. Potential evaporation rates over
                      saturated bare soil showed clear differences between fine
                      sand, coarse sand and gravel on an annual basis. PEfine was
                      higher than PEcoarse and PEgravel (7.3 $\%$ and 11.0 $\%$
                      respectively). The differences between measured PE rates
                      over different surfaces were especially pronounced during
                      daytime in spring and summer, but showed minor differences
                      in autumn and winter. These results are quantitatively
                      explained with detailed calculations of the surface energy
                      balance and it is found that differences in available energy
                      over the soil textures, related to different albedos, as
                      well as different porosities and thermal properties for the
                      materials (which influence soil temperatures) explain the
                      differences. This shows that PE is different for different
                      soil textures, which is neglected in most hydrological
                      studies. Nevertheless, the full-form Penman-Monteith
                      equation can reproduce the PE differences over soil textures
                      quite well in autumn and winter, but a simplified approach
                      to calculate the ground heat flux does not allow to
                      reproduce PE differences between textures.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
                      (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000891279200001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128194},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/917280},
}