Home > Publications database > Customized biochar for soil applications in arid land: Effect of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on soil microbial enumeration and respiration > print

001     917288
005     20230224084254.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105693
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0165-2370
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-250X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/33556
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000861803700003
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-00518
082 _ _ |a 660
100 1 _ |a Al-Rabaiai, Ahmed
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Customized biochar for soil applications in arid land: Effect of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on soil microbial enumeration and respiration
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|c 2022
|b Science Direct
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1673602034_32709
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Biochar is rapidly gaining worldwide interest as an agro-technology for increasing soil health and carbon storage. This study investigated the physicochemical characteristics and impact on soil microbes of biochar amendments from three feedstock sources: date palm leaves (D), mesquite plants (M) and sludge compost (S.C.); pyrolyzed at 450 ℃, 600 ℃ and 750 ℃. Scanning electron microscopy images showed an apparent pore size increase with increasing pyrolysis temperature. The increase in pyrolysis temperature decreased O-H and C-O bonds and increased the proportion of C-C bonds, as obtained from the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies. Thermostability was highest at a pyrolysis temperature of 750 ℃, with distinct thermal decomposition profiles for each of the three feedstock materials used, as indicated by the dynamic thermal gravimetric analysis. The SC biochars showed the highest mineral content (45–66%) with significantly higher water-soluble and total concentrations of mineral elements. The SC samples also showed the presence of possible soil contaminants such as Pb and As, and its use as a soil amendment is not recommended, even though the SC at 450 ℃ was the only nonalkaline biochar in this study. The M feedstock produced biochar with the highest surface area (600 m2 g−1) and carbon content based on loss on ignition (94.98%); nevertheless, the M biochar reduced soil microbial enumeration and respiration. This reduction increased with increasing pyrolysis temperature. Therefore, the M biochar feedstocks are not recommended for improving soil health and may be tested in the future as a microbial inhibitor for soil-borne plant pathogens. Considering the physicochemical properties and the biochar impact on soil, D at 600 ℃ was the best biochar selected for further studies as a soil amendment. The large differences in biochar physicochemical properties and their effect on soil microbes observed in this study suggest that the feedstock type and pyrolysis temperatures must be considered during biochar amendment production for improving soil health in arid-land agroecosystems.
536 _ _ |a 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Menezes-Blackburn, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Al-Ismaily, Said
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Janke, Rhonda
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Pracejus, Bernhard
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Al-Alawi, Ahmed
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Al-Kindi, Mohamed
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Bol, Roland
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105693
|g Vol. 168, p. 105693 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1484647-0
|p 105693 -
|t Journal of analytical and applied pyrolysis
|v 168
|y 2022
|x 0165-2370
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/917288/files/postprintAlrabaiaietal.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:917288
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J ANAL APPL PYROL : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J ANAL APPL PYROL : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-17
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21