001     917525
005     20230224084240.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/gmd-15-8931-2022
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1991-959X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1991-9603
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/33637
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000898541700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-00738
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Gong, Bing
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177767
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Temperature forecasting by deep learning methods
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2022
|b Copernicus
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1673943515_27886
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models solve a system of partial differential equations based on physical laws to forecast the future state of the atmosphere. These models are deployed operationally, but they are computationally very expensive. Recently, the potential of deep neural networks to generate bespoke weather forecasts has been explored in a couple of scientific studies inspired by the success of video frame prediction models in computer vision. In this study, a simple recurrent neural network with convolutional filters, called ConvLSTM, and an advanced generative network, the Stochastic Adversarial Video Prediction (SAVP) model, are applied to create hourly forecasts of the 2 m temperature for the next 12 h over Europe. We make use of 13 years of data from the ERA5 reanalysis, of which 11 years are utilized for training and 1 year each is used for validating and testing. We choose the 2 m temperature, total cloud cover, and the 850 hPa temperature as predictors and show that both models attain predictive skill by outperforming persistence forecasts. SAVP is superior to ConvLSTM in terms of several evaluation metrics, confirming previous results from computer vision that larger, more complex networks are better suited to learn complex features and to generate better predictions. The 12 h forecasts of SAVP attain a mean squared error (MSE) of about 2.3 K2, an anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) larger than 0.85, a structural similarity index (SSIM) of around 0.72, and a gradient ratio (rG) of about 0.82. The ConvLSTM yields a higher MSE (3.6 K2), a smaller ACC (0.80) and SSIM (0.65), and a slightly larger rG (0.84). The superior performance of SAVP in terms of MSE, ACC, and SSIM can be largely attributed to the generator. A sensitivity study shows that a larger weight of the generative adversarial network (GAN) component in the SAVP loss leads to even better preservation of spatial variability at the cost of a somewhat increased MSE (2.5 K2). Including the 850 hPa temperature as an additional predictor enhances the forecast quality, and the model also benefits from a larger spatial domain. By contrast, adding the total cloud cover as predictor or reducing the amount of training data to 8 years has only small effects. Although the temperature forecasts obtained in this way are still less powerful than contemporary NWP models, this study demonstrates that sophisticated deep neural networks may achieve considerable forecast quality beyond the nowcasting range in a purely data-driven way.
536 _ _ |a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|c POF4-511
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a MAELSTROM - MAchinE Learning for Scalable meTeoROlogy and cliMate (955513)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)955513
|c 955513
|f H2020-JTI-EuroHPC-2019-1
|x 1
536 _ _ |a IntelliAQ - Artificial Intelligence for Air Quality (787576)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)787576
|c 787576
|f ERC-2017-ADG
|x 2
536 _ _ |a Earth System Data Exploration (ESDE)
|0 G:(DE-Juel-1)ESDE
|c ESDE
|x 3
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
700 1 _ |a Langguth, Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180790
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ji, Yan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)187069
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Mozaffari, Amirpasha
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166264
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Stadtler, Scarlet
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180752
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Mache, Karim
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)187076
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Schultz, Martin G.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)6952
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/gmd-15-8931-2022
|g Vol. 15, no. 23, p. 8931 - 8956
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2456725-5
|n 23
|p 8931 - 8956
|t Geoscientific model development
|v 15
|y 2022
|x 1991-959X
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/917525/files/gmd-15-8931-2022.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:917525
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177767
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180790
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187069
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166264
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180752
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)187076
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)6952
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b GEOSCI MODEL DEV : 2021
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-01-16T18:00:10Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-01-16T18:00:10Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b GEOSCI MODEL DEV : 2021
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-25
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2021-01-16T18:00:10Z
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
|k JSC
|l Jülich Supercomputing Center
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21