% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Huijnen:9367,
author = {Huijnen, V. and Eskes, H.J. and Poupkou, A. and Elbern, H.
and Boersma, K.F. and Foret, G. and Sofiev, M. and
Valdebenito, A. and Flemming, J. and Stein, O. and Gross, A.
and Robertson, L. and D'Isidoro, M. and Kioutsioukis, I. and
Friese, E. and Amstrup, B. and Berstrom, R. and Strunk, A.
and Vira, J. and Zyryanov, D. and Maurizi, A. and Melas, D.
and Peuch, V.-H. and Zerefos, C.},
title = {{C}omparison of {OMI} {NO}2 tropospheric columns with an
ensemble of global and {E}uropean regional air quality
models},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {10},
issn = {1680-7316},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-9367},
pages = {3273 - 3296},
year = {2010},
note = {GEMS was funded by the European Commission under the EU
Sixth Research Framework Programme, contract number
SIP4-CT-2004-516099. The authors would like to thank two
anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments that led
to a substantial strengthening of the content of the paper.},
abstract = {We present a comparison of tropospheric NO2 from OMI
measurements to the median of an ensemble of Regional Air
Quality (RAQ) models, and an intercomparison of the
contributing RAQ models and two global models for the period
July 2008 - June 2009 over Europe. The model forecasts were
produced routinely on a daily basis in the context of the
European GEMS ("Global and regional Earth-system
(atmosphere) Monitoring using Satellite and in-situ data")
project. The tropospheric vertical column of the RAQ
ensemble median shows a spatial distribution which agrees
well with the OMI NO2 observations, with a correlation
r=0.8. This is higher than the correlations from any one of
the individual RAQ models, which supports the use of a model
ensemble approach for regional air pollution forecasting.
The global models show high correlations compared to OMI,
but with significantly less spatial detail, due to their
coarser resolution. Deviations in the tropospheric NO2
columns of individual RAQ models from the mean were in the
range of $20-34\%$ in winter and $40-62\%$ in summer,
suggesting that the RAQ ensemble prediction is relatively
more uncertain in the summer months.The ensemble median
shows a stronger seasonal cycle of NO2 columns than OMI, and
the ensemble is on average $50\%$ below the OMI observations
in summer, whereas in winter the bias is small. On the other
hand the ensemble median shows a somewhat weaker seasonal
cycle than NO2 surface observations from the Dutch Air
Quality Network, and on average a negative bias of
$14\%.Full$ profile information was available for two RAQ
models and for the global models. For these models the
retrieval averaging kernel was applied. Minor differences
are found for area-averaged model columns with and without
applying the kernel, which shows that the impact of
replacing the a priori profiles by the RAQ model profiles is
on average small. However, the contrast between major
hotspots and rural areas is stronger for the direct modeled
vertical columns than the columns where the averaging
kernels are applied, related to a larger relative
contribution of the free troposphere and the coarse
horizontal resolution in the a priori profiles compared to
the RAQ models.In line with validation results reported in
the literature, summertime concentrations in the lowermost
boundary layer in the a priori profiles from the DOMINO
product are significantly larger than the RAQ model
concentrations and surface observations over the
Netherlands. This affects the profile shape, and contributes
to a high bias in OMI tropospheric columns over polluted
regions. The global models indicate that the upper
troposphere may contribute significantly to the total column
and it is important to account for this in comparisons with
RAQ models. A combination of upper troposphere model biases,
the a priori profile effects and DOMINO product retrieval
issues could explain the discrepancy observed between the
OMI observations and the ensemble median in summer.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-2},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB791},
pnm = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406},
shelfmark = {Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000276663600009},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/9367},
}