% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wehrhan:9702,
author = {Wehrhan, A. and Streck, T. and Groeneweg, J. and Vereecken,
H. and Kasteel, R.},
title = {{L}ong-{T}erm {S}orption and {D}esorption of {S}ulfadiazine
in {S}oil: {E}xperiments and {M}odeling},
journal = {Journal of environmental quality},
volume = {39},
issn = {0047-2425},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {ASA [u.a.]},
reportid = {PreJuSER-9702},
pages = {654 - 666},
year = {2010},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Antibiotics, such as sulfadiazine (SDZ), may enter arable
soil by spreading of manure of medicated husbandry or
directly by the excrement of grazing animals. Knowledge of
the fate of antibiotics in soils is crucial for assessing
the environmental risk of these compounds, including
possible transport to ground water. Kinetic sorption of
(14)C-labeled SDZ
(4-amino-N-pyrimidin-2-yl-benzenesulfonamide) was
investigated using the batch technique. The batch
sorption-desorption experiments were conducted at various
concentration levels (0.044-13 mg L(-1) initial solute
concentration) and time scales (0.75-272 d). Sorption of
(14)C-SDZ in the investigated silty loam was time dependent
and strongly nonlinear in the solution phase concentration.
The time to reach an apparent sorption equilibrium was about
20 d. However, desorption was very slow, and 41 d were
insufficient to reach the desorption equilibrium. An inverse
modeling technique was used to identify relevant sorption
processes of (14)C-SDZ during the batch experiments. Among
the investigated two- and three-domain sorption models,
adsorption and desorption of (14)C-SDZ were best described
with a new model defining two sorption domains and four
parameters. Whereas sorption in the first sorption domain
was nonlinear and instantaneous, solute uptake in the second
sorption domain was rate limited following first-order
kinetics. Desorption followed the same rate law until an
equilibrium distribution was reached. After that, desorption
was assumed to be impossible due to partly irreversible
sorption. Although the proposed model needs further
validation, it contributes to the discussion on complex
sorption processes of organic chemicals in soils.},
keywords = {Adsorption / Anti-Infective Agents: chemistry / Models,
Chemical / Soil: analysis / Sulfadiazine: chemistry /
Anti-Infective Agents (NLM Chemicals) / Soil (NLM Chemicals)
/ Sulfadiazine (NLM Chemicals) / J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4 / JARA-ENERGY / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$ /
$I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:20176838},
UT = {WOS:000275383600022},
doi = {10.2134/jeq2009.0001},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/9702},
}