000999156 001__ 999156
000999156 005__ 20230929112512.0
000999156 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1039/D2SE01170K
000999156 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/33914
000999156 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000912096000001
000999156 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-01199
000999156 082__ $$a660
000999156 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aWulf, Christina$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000999156 245__ $$aWeighting factor elicitation for sustainability assessment of energy technologies
000999156 260__ $$aCambridge$$bRoyal Society of Chemistry$$c2023
000999156 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000999156 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000999156 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1676548440_6239
000999156 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000999156 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000999156 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000999156 520__ $$aIn this paper, an approach for sustainability assessment of innovative energy technologies is expanded bymulti-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to aggregate indicator results and support decisionmaking.One of the most important steps for MCDA is to determine weighting factors for individualindicators. Thus, a workshop was performed to elicit weighting factors for sustainability assessments ofenergy technologies from developers of such technologies and energy system modellers fromacademia. These stakeholders expressed their preferences with respect to sustainability criteria using theSimple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). A triple bottom line approach of sustainabledevelopment was used as the basis for the aggregation of indicator results. This approach is based onLife Cycle Costing, Life Cycle Assessment and social indicators. Obtained weighting factors were appliedto an integrative sustainability assessment with the aggregation method Preference Ranking OrganizationMETHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE). Hydrogen-based mobility as an importanttechnology to foster decarbonization in the transport sector is used as a case study for the application ofthe derived weighting factors. A conventional vehicle, powered by fossil fuel, is compared with a fuel cellelectric vehicle (FCEV) for the year 2050. Different options (pipeline, compressed gaseous hydrogen,liquid hydrogen, liquid organic hydrogen carrier) are discussed for the supply of hydrogen. The resultsfor this weighting factor set are compared with an equal weighting scenario of the three sustainabilitydimensions and indicators within one sustainability dimension. The FCEV, using pipelines for hydrogensupply, came out first in the assessment as well as in all sensitivity analyses.
000999156 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$a1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)$$cPOF4-111$$fPOF IV$$x0
000999156 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000999156 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHaase, Martina$$b1
000999156 7001_ $$00000-0002-8374-4624$$aBaumann, Manuel$$b2
000999156 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aZapp, Petra$$b3$$ufzj
000999156 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2882651-6$$a10.1039/D2SE01170K$$gVol. 7, no. 3, p. 832 - 847$$n3$$p832 - 847$$tSustainable energy & fuels$$v7$$x2398-4902$$y2023
000999156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/999156/files/d2se01170k.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000999156 8767_ $$d2023-03-07$$eHybrid-OA$$jPublish and Read
000999156 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:999156$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000999156 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000999156 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$60000-0002-8374-4624$$a Karlsruhe Institute of Technology$$b2
000999156 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000999156 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lEnergiesystemdesign (ESD)$$vEnergiesystemtransformation$$x0
000999156 9141_ $$y2023
000999156 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0000$$2APC$$aAPC keys set
000999156 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0001$$2APC$$aLocal Funding
000999156 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0002$$2APC$$aDFG OA Publikationskosten
000999156 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0110$$2APC$$aTIB: Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
000999156 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-16
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-16
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium$$d2023-08-19$$wger
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bSUSTAIN ENERG FUELS : 2022$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2023-08-19
000999156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bSUSTAIN ENERG FUELS : 2022$$d2023-08-19
000999156 920__ $$lyes
000999156 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000999156 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000999156 980__ $$ajournal
000999156 980__ $$aVDB
000999156 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000999156 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000999156 980__ $$aAPC