% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wulf:999156,
      author       = {Wulf, Christina and Haase, Martina and Baumann, Manuel and
                      Zapp, Petra},
      title        = {{W}eighting factor elicitation for sustainability
                      assessment of energy technologies},
      journal      = {Sustainable energy $\&$ fuels},
      volume       = {7},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {2398-4902},
      address      = {Cambridge},
      publisher    = {Royal Society of Chemistry},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2023-01199},
      pages        = {832 - 847},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {In this paper, an approach for sustainability assessment of
                      innovative energy technologies is expanded bymulti-criteria
                      decision analysis (MCDA) methods to aggregate indicator
                      results and support decisionmaking.One of the most important
                      steps for MCDA is to determine weighting factors for
                      individualindicators. Thus, a workshop was performed to
                      elicit weighting factors for sustainability assessments
                      ofenergy technologies from developers of such technologies
                      and energy system modellers fromacademia. These stakeholders
                      expressed their preferences with respect to sustainability
                      criteria using theSimple Multi Attribute Rating Technique
                      (SMART). A triple bottom line approach of
                      sustainabledevelopment was used as the basis for the
                      aggregation of indicator results. This approach is based
                      onLife Cycle Costing, Life Cycle Assessment and social
                      indicators. Obtained weighting factors were appliedto an
                      integrative sustainability assessment with the aggregation
                      method Preference Ranking OrganizationMETHod for Enrichment
                      of Evaluations (PROMETHEE). Hydrogen-based mobility as an
                      importanttechnology to foster decarbonization in the
                      transport sector is used as a case study for the application
                      ofthe derived weighting factors. A conventional vehicle,
                      powered by fossil fuel, is compared with a fuel cellelectric
                      vehicle (FCEV) for the year 2050. Different options
                      (pipeline, compressed gaseous hydrogen,liquid hydrogen,
                      liquid organic hydrogen carrier) are discussed for the
                      supply of hydrogen. The resultsfor this weighting factor set
                      are compared with an equal weighting scenario of the three
                      sustainabilitydimensions and indicators within one
                      sustainability dimension. The FCEV, using pipelines for
                      hydrogensupply, came out first in the assessment as well as
                      in all sensitivity analyses.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {660},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000912096000001},
      doi          = {10.1039/D2SE01170K},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/999156},
}