Home > Publications database > Weighting factor elicitation for sustainability assessment of energy technologies > print

001     999156
005     20230929112512.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1039/D2SE01170K
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/33914
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000912096000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-01199
082 _ _ |a 660
100 1 _ |a Wulf, Christina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Weighting factor elicitation for sustainability assessment of energy technologies
260 _ _ |a Cambridge
|c 2023
|b Royal Society of Chemistry
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1676548440_6239
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In this paper, an approach for sustainability assessment of innovative energy technologies is expanded bymulti-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to aggregate indicator results and support decisionmaking.One of the most important steps for MCDA is to determine weighting factors for individualindicators. Thus, a workshop was performed to elicit weighting factors for sustainability assessments ofenergy technologies from developers of such technologies and energy system modellers fromacademia. These stakeholders expressed their preferences with respect to sustainability criteria using theSimple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). A triple bottom line approach of sustainabledevelopment was used as the basis for the aggregation of indicator results. This approach is based onLife Cycle Costing, Life Cycle Assessment and social indicators. Obtained weighting factors were appliedto an integrative sustainability assessment with the aggregation method Preference Ranking OrganizationMETHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE). Hydrogen-based mobility as an importanttechnology to foster decarbonization in the transport sector is used as a case study for the application ofthe derived weighting factors. A conventional vehicle, powered by fossil fuel, is compared with a fuel cellelectric vehicle (FCEV) for the year 2050. Different options (pipeline, compressed gaseous hydrogen,liquid hydrogen, liquid organic hydrogen carrier) are discussed for the supply of hydrogen. The resultsfor this weighting factor set are compared with an equal weighting scenario of the three sustainabilitydimensions and indicators within one sustainability dimension. The FCEV, using pipelines for hydrogensupply, came out first in the assessment as well as in all sensitivity analyses.
536 _ _ |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Haase, Martina
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Baumann, Manuel
|0 0000-0002-8374-4624
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Zapp, Petra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|b 3
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1039/D2SE01170K
|g Vol. 7, no. 3, p. 832 - 847
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2882651-6
|n 3
|p 832 - 847
|t Sustainable energy & fuels
|v 7
|y 2023
|x 2398-4902
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/999156/files/d2se01170k.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:999156
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
910 1 _ |a Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
|6 0000-0002-8374-4624
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a TIB: Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0110
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-16
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-16
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-19
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SUSTAIN ENERG FUELS : 2022
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b SUSTAIN ENERG FUELS : 2022
|d 2023-08-19
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21