000001002 001__ 1002
000001002 005__ 20240712101017.0
000001002 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2008JD009865
000001002 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000260393100005
000001002 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0141-8637
000001002 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20381
000001002 037__ $$aPreJuSER-1002
000001002 041__ $$aeng
000001002 082__ $$a550
000001002 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000001002 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aApel, E. C.$$b0
000001002 245__ $$aIntercomparison of oxygenated volatile organic compound measurements at the SAPHIR atmosphere simulation chamber
000001002 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$c2008
000001002 300__ $$aD20307
000001002 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000001002 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000001002 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000001002 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000001002 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000001002 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000001002 440_0 $$06393$$aJournal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres$$v113$$x0148-0227
000001002 500__ $$aThis work was supported by the EU FP-6 programs ACCENT (GOCE CT-2004-505337) and EUROCHAMP (RII3-CT-2004-505968). We thank R. Haseler and F. J. Johnen for the support of the experiments.
000001002 520__ $$aThis paper presents results from the first large-scale in situ intercomparison of oxygenated volatile organic compound (OVOC) measurements. The intercomparison was conducted blind at the large (270 m(3)) simulation chamber, Simulation of Atmospheric Photochemistry in a Large Reaction Chamber (SAPHIR), in Julich, Germany. Fifteen analytical instruments, representing a wide range of techniques, were challenged with measuring atmospherically relevant OVOC species and toluene (14 species, C-1 to C-7) in the approximate range of 0.5-10 ppbv under three different conditions: (1) OVOCs with no humidity or ozone, (2) OVOCs with humidity added (r.h. approximate to 50%), and (3) OVOCs with ozone (approximate to 60 ppbv) and humidity (r.h. approximate to 50%). The SAPHIR chamber proved to be an excellent facility for conducting this experiment. Measurements from individual instruments were compared to mixing ratios calculated from the chamber volume and the known amount of OVOC injected into the chamber. Benzaldehyde and 1-butanol, compounds with the lowest vapor pressure of those studied, presented the most overall difficulty because of a less than quantitative transfer through some of the participants' analytical systems. The performance of each individual instrument is evaluated with respect to reference values in terms of time series and correlation plots for each compound under the three measurement conditions. A few of the instruments performed very well, closely matching the reference values, and all techniques demonstrated the potential for quantitative OVOC measurements. However, this study showed that nonzero offsets are present for specific compounds in a number of instruments and overall improvements are necessary for the majority of the techniques evaluated here.
000001002 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aAtmosphäre und Klima$$cP22$$x0
000001002 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000001002 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16306$$aBrauers, T.$$b1$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB810$$aKoppmann, R.$$b2$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB78958$$aBandowe, B.$$b3$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB26257$$aBoßmeyer, J.$$b4$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)133799$$aHolzke, C.$$b5$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)5344$$aTillmann, R.$$b6$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16324$$aWahner, A.$$b7$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)2367$$aWegener, R.$$b8$$uFZJ
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBrunner, A.$$b9
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJocher, M.$$b10
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRuuskanen, T.$$b11
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSpirig, C.$$b12
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSteigner, D.$$b13
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSteinbrecher, R.$$b14
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGomez Alvarez, E.$$b15
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMüller, K.$$b16
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBurrows, J. P.$$b17
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchade, G.$$b18
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSolomon, S. J.$$b19
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLadstätter-Weißenmayer, A.$$b20
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSimmonds, P.$$b21
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aYoung, D.$$b22
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHopkins, J. R.$$b23
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLewis, A. C.$$b24
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLegreid, G.$$b25
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aReimann, S.$$b26
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHansel, A.$$b27
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWisthaler, A.$$b28
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBlake, R. S.$$b29
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEllis, A. M.$$b30
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMonks, P. S.$$b31
000001002 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWyche, K.P.$$b32
000001002 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7$$a10.1029/2008JD009865$$gVol. 113, p. D20307$$pD20307$$q113<D20307$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres$$tJournal of Geophysical Research$$v113$$x0148-0227$$y2008
000001002 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009865
000001002 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002/files/2008JD009865.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000001002 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002/files/2008JD009865.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000001002 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1002$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000001002 9141_ $$y2008
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer review
000001002 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000001002 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406$$aDE-HGF$$bUmwelt$$kP22$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vAtmosphäre und Klima$$x0$$zfortgesetzt als P23
000001002 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB791$$d30.09.2010$$gICG$$kICG-2$$lTroposphäre$$x1
000001002 9201_ $$0I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$$gJARA$$kJARA-ENERGY$$lJülich-Aachen Research Alliance - Energy$$x2
000001002 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045$$gJARA$$kJARA-SIM$$lJülich-Aachen Research Alliance - Simulation Sciences$$x3
000001002 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)101863
000001002 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000001002 980__ $$aVDB
000001002 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000001002 980__ $$ajournal
000001002 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000001002 980__ $$aI:(DE-82)080011_20140620
000001002 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
000001002 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000001002 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000001002 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000001002 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045
000001002 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)VDB1047