Home > Workflow collections > Publication Charges > pH Effects in a Model Electrocatalytic Reaction Disentangled > print

001     1005447
005     20240712113153.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1021/jacsau.2c00662
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/34390
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 37124300
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000978886200001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-01478
082 _ _ |a 540
100 1 _ |a Zhu, Xinwei
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180589
|b 0
245 _ _ |a pH Effects in a Model Electrocatalytic Reaction Disentangled
260 _ _ |a Washington, DC
|c 2023
|b ACS Publications
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1707830467_14049
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Varying the solution pH not only changes the reactant concentrations in bulk solution but also the local reaction environment (LRE) that is shaped furthermore by macroscopic mass transport and microscopic electric double layer (EDL) effects. Understanding ubiquitous pH effects in electrocatalysis requires disentangling these interwoven factors, which is a difficult, if not impossible, task without physical modeling. Herein, we demonstrate how a hierarchical model that integrates microkinetics, double-layer charging, and macroscopic mass transport can help understand pH effects of the formic acid oxidation reaction (FAOR). In terms of the relation between the peak activity and the solution pH, intrinsic pH effects without consideration of changes in the LRE would lead to a bell-shaped curve with a peak at pH = 6. Adding only macroscopic mass transport, we can already reproduce qualitatively the experimentally observed trapezoidal shape with a plateau between pH 5 and 10 in perchlorate and sulfate solutions. A quantitative agreement with experimental data requires consideration of EDL effects beyond Frumkin correlations. Specifically, the peculiar nonmonotonic surface charging relation affects the free energies of adsorbed intermediates. We further discuss pH effects of FAOR in phosphate and chloride-containing solutions, for which anion adsorption becomes important. This study underpins the importance of a full consideration of multiple interrelated factors for the interpretation of pH effects in electrocatalysis.
536 _ _ |a 1212 - Materials and Interfaces (POF4-121)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1212
|c POF4-121
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 1215 - Simulations, Theory, Optics, and Analytics (STOA) (POF4-121)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215
|c POF4-121
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Huang, Jun
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)192568
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Eikerling, Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)178034
|b 2
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1021/jacsau.2c00662
|g p. jacsau.2c00662
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3049543-X
|n 4
|p 1052–1064
|t JACS Au
|v 3
|y 2023
|x 2691-3704
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005447/files/jacsau.2c00662.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1005447
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180589
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)192568
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)178034
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Photovoltaik und Windenergie
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1212
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Photovoltaik und Windenergie
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-18
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b JACS AU : 2022
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-04-18T10:11:29Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-04-18T10:11:29Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-04-18T10:11:29Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b JACS AU : 2022
|d 2023-08-25
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-13-20190226
|k IEK-13
|l IEK-13
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-13-20190226
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-3-20190226

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21