Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Artificial intelligence, superefficiency and the end of work: a humanistic perspective on meaning in life > print

001     1006830
005     20240626202010.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s43681-023-00273-w
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2730-5953
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2730-5961
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-01874
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-01874
082 _ _ |a 300
100 1 _ |a Knell, Sebastian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Artificial intelligence, superefficiency and the end of work: a humanistic perspective on meaning in life
260 _ _ |a [Cham]
|c 2023
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1719388648_17792
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a How would it be assessed from an ethical point of view if human wage work were replaced by artificially intelligent systems (AI) in the course of an automation process? An answer to this question has been discussed above all under the aspects of individual well-being and social justice. Although these perspectives are important, in this article, we approach the question from a different perspective: that of leading a meaningful life, as understood in analytical ethics on the basis of the so-called meaning-in-life debate. Our thesis here is that a life without wage work loses specific sources of meaning, but can still be sufficiently meaningful in certain other ways. Our starting point is John Danaher’s claim that ubiquitous automation inevitably leads to an achievement gap. Although we share this diagnosis, we reject his provocative solution according to which game-like virtual realities could be an adequate substitute source of meaning. Subsequently, we outline our own systematic alternative which we regard as a decidedly humanistic perspective. It focuses both on different kinds of social work and on rather passive forms of being related to meaningful contents. Finally, we go into the limits and unresolved points of our argumentation as part of an outlook, but we also try to defend its fundamental persuasiveness against a potential objection.
536 _ _ |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Rüther, Markus
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161345
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s43681-023-00273-w
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3043753-2
|p 363
|t AI and ethics
|v 4
|y 2023
|x 2730-5953
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1006830/files/s43681-023-00273-w.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1006830
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161345
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a Local Funding
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
|2 APC
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
|2 APC
915 p c |a DEAL: Springer Nature 2020
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-11
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-19
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21