001     1008686
005     20240313103123.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fnint.2023.935177
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-02477
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a 37396571
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:001018401100001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-02477
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Zajzon, Barna
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171197
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Toward reproducible models of sequence learning: replication and analysis of a modular spiking network with reward-based learning
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2023
|b Frontiers Research Foundation
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1689931058_23743
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a To acquire statistical regularities from the world, the brain must reliably process, and learn from, spatio-temporally structured information. Although an increasing number of computational models have attempted to explain how such sequence learning may be implemented in the neural hardware, many remain limited in functionality or lack biophysical plausibility. If we are to harvest the knowledge within these models and arrive at a deeper mechanistic understanding of sequential processing in cortical circuits, it is critical that the models and their findings are accessible, reproducible, and quantitatively comparable. Here we illustrate the importance of these aspects by providing a thorough investigation of a recently proposed sequence learning model. We re-implement the modular columnar architecture and reward-based learning rule in the open-source NEST simulator, and successfully replicate the main findings of the original study. Building on these, we perform an in-depth analysis of the model's robustness to parameter settings and underlying assumptions, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses. We demonstrate a limitation of the model consisting in the hard-wiring of the sequence order in the connectivity patterns, and suggest possible solutions. Finally, we show that the core functionality of the model is retained under more biologically-plausible constraints
536 _ _ |a 5232 - Computational Principles (POF4-523)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5232
|c POF4-523
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a neuroIC002 - Recurrence and stochasticity for neuro-inspired computation (EXS-SF-neuroIC002)
|0 G:(DE-82)EXS-SF-neuroIC002
|c EXS-SF-neuroIC002
|x 1
536 _ _ |a DFG project 491111487 - Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2022 - 2024 / Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ) (491111487)
|0 G:(GEPRIS)491111487
|c 491111487
|x 2
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
700 1 _ |a Duarte, Renato
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Morrison, Abigail
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)151166
|b 2
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fnint.2023.935177
|g Vol. 17, p. 935177
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2452962-X
|p 935177
|t Frontiers in integrative neuroscience
|v 17
|y 2023
|x 1662-5145
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1008686/files/fnint-17-935177.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1008686
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171197
910 1 _ |a Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151166
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-523
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Neuromorphic Computing and Network Dynamics
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5232
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-05-11T10:28:29Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-05-11T10:28:29Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FRONT INTEGR NEUROSC : 2022
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2021-05-11T10:28:29Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-24
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-24
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
|k INM-6
|l Computational and Systems Neuroscience
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
|k IAS-6
|l Theoretical Neuroscience
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
|k INM-10
|l Jara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships
|x 2
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21