% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Li:1014720,
author = {Li, Chenkun and Peng, Zhangquan and Huang, Jun},
title = {{I}mpedance {R}esponse of {E}lectrochemical {I}nterfaces:
{P}art {IV}─{L}ow-{F}requency {I}nductive {L}oop for a
{S}ingle-{E}lectron {R}eaction},
journal = {The journal of physical chemistry / C},
volume = {127},
number = {33},
issn = {1932-7447},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {Soc.},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-03410},
pages = {16367 - 16373},
year = {2023},
abstract = {The low-frequency inductive loop is usually attributed to
relaxation of adsorbed intermediates of multistep reactions
in electrocatalysis and corrosion. Herein, we report a
low-frequency inductive loop for a single-electron reaction
when the electrode potential (EM), the equilibrium potential
(Eeq), and the potential of zero charge (Epzc) are
different, namely, under nonequilibrium conditions.
Interestingly enough, although both reactions involve only
one electron, the metal deposition reaction (M+ + e ↔ M)
and the redox couple reaction (Fe(CN)63– + e ↔
Fe(CN)64–) show different impedance shapes. The
low-frequency inductive loop is observed only for the M+ + e
↔ M reaction in the oxidation direction because its
faradaic current has a negative phase angle due to double
layer effects. Moreover, we find that the low-frequency
inductive loop occurs only when the polarization curve has
no diffusion-limiting features.},
cin = {IEK-13},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-13-20190226},
pnm = {1212 - Materials and Interfaces (POF4-121)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1212},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001049424300001},
doi = {10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02830},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014720},
}