guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Voxel-wise or Region-wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does it matter? |
| Home > Publications database > Voxel-wise or Region-wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does it matter? |
| Preprint | FZJ-2024-07519 |
; ; ; ; ; ;
2024
This record in other databases:
Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1101/2024.12.10.627766 doi:10.34734/FZJ-2024-07519
Abstract: Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using denoising procedures at the finest resolution, i.e. the voxel time series. Typically the voxel-wise time series are then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain a rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is missing.In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of denoising at different time series resolutions (voxel- and region-level) in 370 unrelated subjects from the 1HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series resolution, we considered additional factors such as aggregation method (Mean and first eigenvariate [EV]) and parcellation granularity (100, 400, and 1,000 regions). To assess the effect of those choices on the utility of the resulting whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual specificity (fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age and three cognitive scores.Our findings show generally equal or better performance for region-level denoising with notable differences depending on the aggregation method. Using mean aggregation yielded equal individual specificity and prediction performance for voxel- and region-level denoising. When EV was employed for aggregation, the individual specificity of voxel-level denoising was reduced compared to region-level denoising. Increasing parcellation granularity generally improved individual specificity. For the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level denoising in the case of aggregating with the EV.Based on these results, we recommend the adoption of region-level denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using mean aggregation. This approach offers equal individual specificity and prediction capacity with reduced computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.
|
The record appears in these collections: |
PDF