% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Saberi:1041703,
author = {Saberi, Amin and Wischnewski, Kevin and Jung, Kyesam and
Lotter, Leon and Schaare, H Lina and Banaschewski, Tobias
and Barker, Gareth and Bokde, Arun and Desrivières, Sylvane
and Flor, Herta and Grigis, Antoine and Garavan, Hugh and
Gowland, Penny and Heinz, Andreas and Brühl, Rüdiger and
Martinot, Jean- Luc and Martinot, Marie-Laure and Artiges,
Eric and Nees, Frauke and Orfanos, Dimitri Papadopoulos and
Lemaitre, Herve and Poustka, Luise and Hohmann, Sarah and
Holz, Nathalie and Baeuchl, Christian and Smolka, Michael N.
and Vaidya, Nilakshi and Walter, Henrik and Whelan, Robert
and Schumann, Gunter and Consortium, IMAGEN and Paus,
Tomáš and Dukart, Juergen and Bernhardt, Boris C. and
Popovych, Oleksandr and Eickhoff, Simon and Valk, Sofie},
title = {{A}dolescent maturation of cortical excitation-inhibition
ratio based on individualized biophysical network modeling},
journal = {Science advances},
volume = {11},
number = {23},
issn = {2375-2548},
address = {Washington, DC [u.a.]},
publisher = {Assoc.},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-02388},
pages = {.},
year = {2025},
abstract = {The excitation-inhibition ratio is a key functional
property of cortical microcircuits which changes throughout
an individual’s lifespan. Adolescence is considered a
critical period for maturation of excitation-inhibition
ratio. This has primarily been observed in animal studies.
However, there is limited human in vivo evidence for
maturation of excitation-inhibition ratio at the individual
level. Here, we developed an individualized in vivo marker
of regional excitation-inhibition ratio in human
adolescents, estimated using large-scale simulations of
biophysical network models fitted to resting-state
functional imaging data from both cross-sectional (n = 752)
and longitudinal (n = 149) cohorts. In both datasets, we
found a widespread decrease in excitation-inhibition ratio
in association areas, paralleled by an increase or lack of
change in sensorimotor areas. This developmental pattern was
aligned with multiscale markers of sensorimotor-association
differentiation. Although our main findings were robust
across alternative modeling configurations, we observed
local variations, highlighting the importance of
methodological choices for future studies.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {500},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {40465711},
UT = {WOS:001507658900013},
doi = {10.1126/sciadv.adr8164},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1041703},
}