001     1046140
005     20251209093612.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1080/09515089.2025.2549085
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0951-5089
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1465-394X
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-03705
082 _ _ |a 100
100 1 _ |a Rathkopf, Charles
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)176538
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Merely virtual virtue? The empathy machine hypothesis and the promise of virtual reality
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2025
|b Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1765185618_11515
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Virtual reality (VR) induces a radical psychological reorientation. Yet descriptions of this reorientation are often steeped in theoretically misleading metaphors. We offer a more measured account, grounded in both philosophy and cognitive psychology, and use it to assess the claim that VR promotes moral learning by simulating another’s perspective. This hypothesis depends on the assumption that avatar use produces experiences sufficiently similar to those of others to enable empathic growth. We reject that assumption and offer two arguments against it. Empathy relevant to moral learning requires interpretive effort and contextual understanding, not just a shift in perspective. And VR’s open-ended, user-driven structure tends to reinforce prior assumptions rather than unsettle them. Still, avatar use may have a different effect on moral learning, which we call self-fragmentation. By loosening the boundaries of the self, VR may expand the range of people one is disposed to empathize with.
536 _ _ |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)138795
|b 1
773 _ _ |a 10.1080/09515089.2025.2549085
|g p. 1 - 19
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1476956-6
|p 1 - 19
|t Philosophical psychology
|v .
|y 2025
|x 0951-5089
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)176538
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)138795
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PHILOS PSYCHOL : 2022
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2024-12-12
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-12
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a EDITORS
980 _ _ |a VDBINPRINT
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21