001     1047194
005     20251110202103.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.1101/2025.09.02.673635
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-04143
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)195856
|a Rauland, Amelie
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Benchmarking Orientation Distribution Function Estimation Methods for Tractometry in Single-Shell Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An Evaluation of Test-Retest Reliability and Predictive Capability
260 _ _ |a Cold Spring Harbor
|b Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY
|c 2025
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)25
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Preprint
|b preprint
|m preprint
|s 1762776272_26650
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a WORKING_PAPER
336 7 _ |0 28
|2 EndNote
|a Electronic Article
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a preprint
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Working Paper
520 _ _ |a Deriving white matter (WM) bundles in-vivo has thus far mainly been applied in research settings, leveraging high angular resolution, multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions that enable advanced reconstruction methods. However, these advanced acquisitions are both time-consuming and costly to acquire. The ability to reconstruct WM bundles in the massive amounts of existing single-shelled, lower angular resolution data from legacy research studies and healthcare systems would offer much broader clinical applications and population-level generalizability. While legacy scans may offer a valuable, large-scale complement to contemporary research datasets, the reliability of white matter bundles derived from these scans remains unclear. Here, we leverage a large research dataset where each 64-direction dMRI scan was acquired as two independent 32-direction runs per subject. To investigate how recently developed bundle segmentation methods generalize to this data, we evaluated the test-retest reliability of the two 32-direction scans, of WM bundle extraction across three orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction methods: generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI), constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), and single-shell three-tissue CSD (SS3T). We found that the majority of WM bundles could be reliably extracted from dMRI scans that were acquired using the 32-direction, single-shell acquisition scheme. The mean dice coefficient of reconstructed WM bundles was consistently higher within-subject than between-subject for all WM bundles and ODF reconstruction methods, illustrating preservation of person-specific anatomy. Further, when using features of the bundles to predict complex reasoning assessed using a computerized cognitive battery, we observed stable prediction accuracies ( r : 0.15-0.36) across the test-retest data. Among the three ODF reconstruction methods, SS3T had a good balance between sensitivity and specificity in external validation, a high intra-class correlation of extracted features, more plausible bundles, and strong predictive performance. More broadly, these results demonstrate that bundle segmentation can achieve robust performance even on lower angular resolution, single-shell dMRI, with particular advantages for ODF methods optimized for single-shell data. This highlights the considerable potential for dMRI collected in healthcare settings and legacy research datasets to accelerate and expand the scope of WM research.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|a 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Meisler, Steven L.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Alexander-Bloch, Aaron F.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Bagautdinova, Joëlle
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Baller, Erica B.
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Gur, Raquel E.
|b 5
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Gur, Ruben C.
|b 6
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Luo, Audrey C.
|b 7
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Moore, Tyler M.
|b 8
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131880
|a Popovych, Oleksandr V.
|b 9
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)177889
|a Reetz, Kathrin
|b 10
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Roalf, David R.
|b 11
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Shinohara, Russell T.
|b 12
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sotardi, Susan
|b 13
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sydnor, Valerie J.
|b 14
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Vossough, Arastoo
|b 15
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|a Eickhoff, Simon B.
|b 16
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Cieslak, Matthew
|b 17
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
|b 18
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2766415-6
|a 10.1101/2025.09.02.673635
|t bioRxiv beta
|y 2025
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1047194/files/Rauland%20Benchmarking%20ODF%20Estimation%20Methods%20for%20Tractometry%20in%20Single-Shell%20dMRI%20Main.docx
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1047194
|p VDB
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)195856
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)195856
|a RWTH Aachen
|b 0
|k RWTH
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131880
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 9
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177889
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 10
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 16
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|a HHU Düsseldorf
|b 16
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a preprint
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21