| Contribution to a book | FZJ-2025-05160 |
2025
Springer Nature Switzerland
Cham
ISBN: 978-3-032-00879-4 (print), 978-3-032-00880-0 (electronic)
This record in other databases:
Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00880-0_1 doi:10.34734/FZJ-2025-05160
Abstract: Starting with a broad use of the term, this chapter examines different types of decision-making and agents. A typology is proposed that can help to avoid confusion and promote understanding, especially in discussions between different scientific disciplines. The typology includes reporting/non-reporting agents, fully/partially transparent agents, and observer-/self-transparent agents. However, the most profound distinction turns out to be between non-discursive and discursive agents. This is mainly because discursivity and responsibility are closely linked. Discursive agents therefore have a special position: they must decide how they deal with other types of agents and what they use them for and how they use them in their own decision-making. So far, only humans can be considered as discursive agents.
|
The record appears in these collections: |