001049582 001__ 1049582
001049582 005__ 20251215162549.0
001049582 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/hbm.70429
001049582 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1065-9471
001049582 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1097-0193
001049582 037__ $$aFZJ-2025-05386
001049582 082__ $$a610
001049582 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)195856$$aRauland, Amelie$$b0
001049582 245__ $$aWhite Matter Bundle Reconstruction From Single‐Shell Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Test–Retest Reliability and Predictive Capability Across Orientation Distribution Function Reconstruction Methods
001049582 260__ $$aNew York, NY$$bWiley-Liss$$c2025
001049582 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001049582 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001049582 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1765812087_9854
001049582 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001049582 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001049582 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001049582 520__ $$aDeriving white matter (WM) bundles in vivo has thus far mainly been applied in research settings, leveraging high angular resolution, multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions that enable modern reconstruction methods. However, these advanced acquisitions are both time-consuming and costly to acquire. The ability to reconstruct WM bundles in the massive amounts of existing single-shelled, lower angular resolution data from legacy research studies and healthcare systems would offer much broader clinical applications and population-level generalizability. While legacy scans may offer a valuable, large-scale complement to contemporary research datasets, the reliability of white matter bundles derived from these scans remains unclear. Here, we leverage a large research dataset where each 64-direction dMRI scan was acquired as two independent 32-direction runs per subject. To investigate how a state-of-the-art bundle-specific reconstruction method generalizes to this data, we evaluated the test–retest reliability of WM bundles reconstructed from the two 32-direction scans across three orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction methods: generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI), constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), and single-shell three-tissue CSD (SS3T). We found that the majority of WM bundles could be reliably extracted from dMRI scans that were acquired using the 32-direction, single-shell acquisition scheme. The mean Dice coefficient of reconstructed WM bundles was consistently higher within subject than between subject for all WM bundles and ODF reconstruction methods, illustrating preservation of person-specific anatomy. Further, when using features of the bundles to predict complex reasoning assessed using a computerized cognitive battery, we observed stable prediction accuracies (r: 0.15–0.36) across the test–retest data. Among the three ODF reconstruction methods, SS3T had a good balance between sensitivity and specificity when comparing the reconstructed bundles to atlas bundles, a high intra-class correlation of extracted features, more plausible bundles, and strong predictive performance. More broadly, these results demonstrate that bundle-specific reconstruction can achieve robust performance even on lower angular resolution, single-shell dMRI, with particular advantages for ODF methods optimized for single-shell data. This highlights the considerable potential for dMRI collected in healthcare settings and legacy research datasets to accelerate and expand the scope of WM research.
001049582 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001049582 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x1
001049582 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeisler, Steven L.$$b1
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAlexander-Bloch, Aaron F.$$b2
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBagautdinova, Joëlle$$b3
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBaller, Erica B.$$b4
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGur, Raquel E.$$b5
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGur, Ruben C.$$b6
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLuo, Audrey C.$$b7
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoore, Tyler M.$$b8
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131880$$aPopovych, Oleksandr V.$$b9
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)177889$$aReetz, Kathrin$$b10
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRoalf, David R.$$b11
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aShinohara, Russell T.$$b12
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSotardi, Susan$$b13
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSydnor, Valerie J.$$b14
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVossough, Arastoo$$b15
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon B.$$b16
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCieslak, Matthew$$b17
001049582 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSatterthwaite, Theodore D.$$b18$$eCorresponding author
001049582 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1492703-2$$a10.1002/hbm.70429$$gVol. 46, no. 17, p. e70429$$n17$$pe70429$$tHuman brain mapping$$v46$$x1065-9471$$y2025
001049582 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)195856$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001049582 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131880$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b9$$kFZJ
001049582 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)177889$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b10$$kFZJ
001049582 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b16$$kFZJ
001049582 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b16
001049582 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$a (sattertt@pennmedicine.upenn.edu)$$b18
001049582 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001049582 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x1
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2024-12-19$$wger
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3001$$2StatID$$aDEAL Wiley$$d2024-12-19$$wger
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Anonymous peer review$$d2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2024-12-19
001049582 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2024-12-19
001049582 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
001049582 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113$$kINM-11$$lJara-Institut Quantum Information$$x1
001049582 980__ $$ajournal
001049582 980__ $$aEDITORS
001049582 980__ $$aVDBINPRINT
001049582 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
001049582 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113
001049582 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED