001     1049582
005     20251215162549.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/hbm.70429
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1065-9471
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1097-0193
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-05386
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Rauland, Amelie
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)195856
|b 0
245 _ _ |a White Matter Bundle Reconstruction From Single‐Shell Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Test–Retest Reliability and Predictive Capability Across Orientation Distribution Function Reconstruction Methods
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2025
|b Wiley-Liss
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1765812087_9854
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Deriving white matter (WM) bundles in vivo has thus far mainly been applied in research settings, leveraging high angular resolution, multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions that enable modern reconstruction methods. However, these advanced acquisitions are both time-consuming and costly to acquire. The ability to reconstruct WM bundles in the massive amounts of existing single-shelled, lower angular resolution data from legacy research studies and healthcare systems would offer much broader clinical applications and population-level generalizability. While legacy scans may offer a valuable, large-scale complement to contemporary research datasets, the reliability of white matter bundles derived from these scans remains unclear. Here, we leverage a large research dataset where each 64-direction dMRI scan was acquired as two independent 32-direction runs per subject. To investigate how a state-of-the-art bundle-specific reconstruction method generalizes to this data, we evaluated the test–retest reliability of WM bundles reconstructed from the two 32-direction scans across three orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction methods: generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI), constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), and single-shell three-tissue CSD (SS3T). We found that the majority of WM bundles could be reliably extracted from dMRI scans that were acquired using the 32-direction, single-shell acquisition scheme. The mean Dice coefficient of reconstructed WM bundles was consistently higher within subject than between subject for all WM bundles and ODF reconstruction methods, illustrating preservation of person-specific anatomy. Further, when using features of the bundles to predict complex reasoning assessed using a computerized cognitive battery, we observed stable prediction accuracies (r: 0.15–0.36) across the test–retest data. Among the three ODF reconstruction methods, SS3T had a good balance between sensitivity and specificity when comparing the reconstructed bundles to atlas bundles, a high intra-class correlation of extracted features, more plausible bundles, and strong predictive performance. More broadly, these results demonstrate that bundle-specific reconstruction can achieve robust performance even on lower angular resolution, single-shell dMRI, with particular advantages for ODF methods optimized for single-shell data. This highlights the considerable potential for dMRI collected in healthcare settings and legacy research datasets to accelerate and expand the scope of WM research.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Meisler, Steven L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Alexander-Bloch, Aaron F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Bagautdinova, Joëlle
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Baller, Erica B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Gur, Raquel E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Gur, Ruben C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Luo, Audrey C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Moore, Tyler M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Popovych, Oleksandr V.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131880
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Reetz, Kathrin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177889
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Roalf, David R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Shinohara, Russell T.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Sotardi, Susan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Sydnor, Valerie J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Vossough, Arastoo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon B.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Cieslak, Matthew
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 18
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/hbm.70429
|g Vol. 46, no. 17, p. e70429
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1492703-2
|n 17
|p e70429
|t Human brain mapping
|v 46
|y 2025
|x 1065-9471
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)195856
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131880
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177889
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 16
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a HHU Düsseldorf
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 16
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a (sattertt@pennmedicine.upenn.edu)
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|b 18
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253
|x 1
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2024-08-08T17:07:28Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-19
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113
|k INM-11
|l Jara-Institut Quantum Information
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a EDITORS
980 _ _ |a VDBINPRINT
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21