% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lu:1049763,
author = {Lu, Han and Normann, Claus and Frase, Lukas and Rotter,
Stefan},
title = {{R}esolving inconsistent effects of t{DCS} on learning
using a homeostatic structural plasticity model},
journal = {Frontiers in network physiology},
volume = {5},
issn = {2674-0109},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-05547},
pages = {1-16},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation
(tDCS) is increasingly used to modulate motor learning.
Current polarity and intensity, electrode montage, and
application before or during learning had mixed effects.
Both Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity were proposed to
account for the observed effects, but the explanatory power
of these models is limited. In a previous modeling study, we
showed that homeostatic structural plasticity (HSP) model
can explain long-lasting after-effects of tDCS and
transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The interference
between motor learning and tDCS, which are both based on HSP
in our model, is a candidate mechanism to resolve complex
and seemingly contradictory experimental
observations.<br><br>Methods: We implemented motor learning
and tDCS in a spiking neural network subject to HSP. The
anatomical connectivity of the engram induced by motor
learning was used to quantify the impact of tDCS on motor
learning.<br><br>Results: Our modeling results demonstrated
that transcranial direct current stimulation applied before
learning had weak modulatory effects. It led to a small
reduction in connectivity if it was applied uniformly. When
applied during learning, targeted anodal stimulation
significantly strengthened the engram, while targeted
cathodal or uniform stimulation weakened it. Applied after
learning, targeted cathodal, but not anodal, tDCS boosted
engram connectivity. Strong tDCS would distort the engram
structure if not applied in a targeted
manner.<br><br>Discussion: Our model explained both Hebbian
and homeostatic phenomena observed in human tDCS experiments
by assuming memory strength positively correlates with
engram connectivity. This includes applications with
different polarity, intensity, electrode montage, and timing
relative to motor learning. The HSP model provides a
promising framework for unraveling the dynamic interaction
between learning and transcranial DC stimulation.},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
(SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511) / SLNS - SimLab
Neuroscience (Helmholtz-SLNS) / DFG project
G:(GEPRIS)194657344 - EXC 1086: BrainLinks-BrainTools
(194657344) / JL SMHB - Joint Lab Supercomputing and
Modeling for the Human Brain (JL SMHB-2021-2027)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111 / G:(DE-Juel1)Helmholtz-SLNS /
G:(GEPRIS)194657344 / G:(DE-Juel1)JL SMHB-2021-2027},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.3389/fnetp.2025.1565802},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1049763},
}