% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Agyei:1050716,
author = {Agyei, Kwabena and Metzner, Ralf and Pflugfelder, Daniel
and Mahlein, Anne-Katrin and Koller, Robert and Huber,
Gregor},
title = {{I}n vivo quantification of temporal transport velocities
and allocation of photoassimilates within sugar beet taproot
by tomographic imaging},
reportid = {FZJ-2026-00461},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Sugar beet is the second largest sugar-producing crop,
accounting for about $40\%$ of global sugar output. However,
there is limited information regarding the phloem transport
dynamics of photoassimilates during taproot development,
which is a critical process in sugar accumulation. This gap
is due to the hidden nature and limited availability of
technologies to measure phloem dynamics. To address this,
the storage organs of growing sugar beets were assessed
using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission
Tomography (PET). Additionally, plants affected by the
rapidly spreading syndrome “basses richesses” (SBR)
disease, which leads to an occlusion of the vascular tissues
and significant yield losses, were analyzed.We found that
generally, flow velocity was highest around 49 and 54 days
after planting and substantially decreased until the last
measurement at 84 days. Tracer flow velocities, ranging from
1.4 to 15.2 mm/min, were fastest in the taproot's inner
section. Interestingly, SBR disease did not alter transport
velocities. However, PET analysis revealed a heterogeneous
distribution of labeled photoassimilates in diseased plants,
with SBR-symptomatic taproot sectors showing very low tracer
signals. This heterogeneity most probably originates from
partial leaf inoculation, leading to an uneven pathogen
distribution within the taproot.These results indicate that
photoassimilate transport is dynamic, varying by organ,
section, and developmental stage. The MRI-PET
co-registration further suggests that biotic stressors like
SBR impair photoassimilate sink capacity early in taproot
development. Combining MRI and PET offers a powerful tool
for understanding critical plant processes under
developmental or environmental stress.},
month = {Oct},
date = {2025-10-27},
organization = {3rd Workshop Carbon Allocation in
Plants, Versailles (France), 27 Oct
2025 - 29 Oct 2025},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {IBG-2},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
sustainable use (POF4-217) / DFG project G:(GEPRIS)390732324
- EXC 2070: PhenoRob - Robotik und Phänotypisierung für
Nachhaltige Nutzpflanzenproduktion (390732324)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171 / G:(GEPRIS)390732324},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1050716},
}