% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Prott:1052780,
author = {Prott, Lea S. and Harlaß, Monique and Marksteiner,
Alexander and Spitznagel, Frank A. and Langner, Robert and
Zhang, Yu and Blatz, Markus B. and Gierthmuehlen, Petra C.},
title = {{F}atigue performance and failure load of
minimally-invasive occlusal veneers made of lithium
disilicate and composition-gradient multilayered zirconia:
{A}n in vitro study},
journal = {Journal of prosthodontic research},
volume = {-},
issn = {1883-1958},
address = {Amstedam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2026-01137},
pages = {$JPR_D_25_00068$},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Purpose: To investigate the effect of ceramic material
(lithium disilicate, LDS vs. composition-gradient
multilayered zirco-nia [4Y-PSZ and 5-PSZ], Z) and ceramic
layer thickness (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.5 mm) on fatigue
performance and failureload of occlusal veneers on
molars.Methods: Seventy-two CAD-CAM-fabricated occlusal
veneer restorations (IPS e.max CAD; IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime
Es-thetic, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into six groups
(n=12, LDS-1.5, LDS-1.0, LDS-0.5; Z-1.5, Z-1.0, Z-0.5).
Restorations wereadhesively cemented (Variolink Esthetic DC,
Ivoclar Vivadent) to dentin-analogue composite dies (Z100,
3M ESPE) andexposed to thermomechanical fatigue (1.2 million
cycles, 49 N, 1.6 Hz, 5-55° C). Single-load-to-failure was
tested with auniversal testing machine. Data were analyzed
using ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc tests and t-tests (P <
0.05).Results: The overall success rate across all materials
and layer thicknesses was $91.7\%.$ Half of the specimens of
group Z-0.5revealed cracks after chewing simulation.
Occlusal veneers fabricated from LDS withstood significantly
higher failure loadsthan gradient multilayered zirconia
veneers in all tested thicknesses. The mean failure load
values led to the followingranking: 3194 N (LDS-0.5)>2683 N
(LDS-1.0)>2338 N (LDS-1.5)>1744 N (Z-1.5)>1310 N
(Z-0.5)>1198 N (Z-1.0).Conclusions: Ultrathin LDS occlusal
veneers outperformed thin and standard thick counterparts,
as well as gradientmultilayered zirconia veneers at all
thickness levels. Ultrathin gradient multilayered zirconia
occlusal veneers were proneto cracks during thermomechanical
fatigue. Individual mechanical properties need to be
considered when aligning therestoration within the
multilayered zirconia blank.Keywords: Ceramics, Occlusal
veneer, Ceramic thickness, Fatigue, Computer-aided design},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00068},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1052780},
}