% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Galldiks:1053908,
author = {Galldiks, Norbert and Hilgers, Julia and Ciantar, Keith and
Kraft, Manuel and Peplinski, Jana-Marie and Werner,
Jan-Michael and Wollring, Michael and Stetter, Isabelle and
Ceccon, Garry and Fink, Gereon and Goldbrunner, Roland and
Ruge, Maximilian and Shah, Nadim and Mottaghy, Felix and
Langen, Karl-Josef and Kocher, Martin and Lohmann, Philipp},
title = {{IMG}-76. {FET} {PET} reveals considerable volumetric and
spatial differences in tumor burden compared to conventional
{MRI} in recurrent glioblastoma},
issn = {1523-5866},
reportid = {FZJ-2026-01606},
year = {2025},
abstract = {AbstractBACKGROUNDIn recurrent glioblastomas, changes in
areas of contrast enhancement and the T2/fluid-attenuated
inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal on conventional MRI
represent the mainstay for local therapy planning.
Nevertheless, compared to conventional MRI, the information
on the tumor burden obtained from amino acid PET may be
considerably different in terms of volumetric assessment and
spatial orientation.METHODSAt suspected recurrence, 56
patients with histomolecularly characterized glioblastoma
underwent O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET and
MR imaging including contrast-enhanced and FLAIR sequences.
Contrast-enhancing and FLAIR volumes were automatically
segmented using HD-GLIO, and FET PET tumor volumes were
assessed using the nnUNet-based $JuST_BrainPET$ segmentation
tool based on a tumor-to-brain ratio of ≥1.6. All
segmentations were visually checked. Subsequently, an
in-house developed workflow was used for a fully automated
assessment of maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios. To
evaluate spatial differences between the modalities,
percentage overlap, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC),
and the 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) were
calculated. Recurrent disease was confirmed either by
neuropathological evaluation of tissue obtained from surgery
or stereotactic biopsy or prompted a change in
treatment.RESULTSAll patients had measurable disease
according to the PET RANO 1.0 criteria (mean tumor-to-brain
ratio, 2.2±0.2). In 52 patients $(93\%),$ the FET PET tumor
volume was significantly larger than the contrast-enhancing
volume (36.5±31.6 mL vs. 18.5±19.7 mL; P<0.001). On
average, FET PET tumor volumes extended by $30\%$ beyond the
combined contrast-enhancing and FLAIR volumes. The spatial
similarity between FET uptake and contrast enhancement was
limited (mean DSC, 0.40±0.23), with an HD95 of 17.8±12.2
mm. The comparison of FET uptake with the FLAIR
hyperintensity revealed even lower spatial similarity (mean
DSC, 0.35±0.16), and a higher boundary discrepancy (HD95,
30.0±14.2 mm).CONCLUSIONSOur results strongly support
integrating both imaging modalities into treatment planning
of patients with glioblastoma at recurrence.},
month = {Nov},
date = {2025-11-20},
organization = {7th Quadrennial Meeting of the World
Federation of Neuro-Oncology Societies,
Honolulu (USA), 20 Nov 2025 - 23 Nov
2025},
cin = {INM-4},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
doi = {10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1155},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1053908},
}