Journal Article PreJuSER-11691

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Biomass and nutrient content of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stem and branches in a mixed stand in southern Belgium

 ;  ;

2010
Elsevier Science Amsterdam [u.a.]

The science of the total environment 408, 2285 - 2294 () [10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.040]

This record in other databases:      

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Accurate estimates of the amounts of nutrients immobilised in the organs and tissues of different tree species are of prime importance to make appropriate tree species selection and determine the harvesting regime that will ensure forest sustainability. Sixteen sessile oaks (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) (64-129years; stem diameters: 17-57cm) and twelve beeches (Fagus sylvatica L.) (43-86years; stem diameters: 9-50cm) were destructively sampled from a mixed stand located on an acid brown soil in southern Belgium. Statistical models were developed to investigate the differences in nutrient concentrations between tree species, between aboveground tree compartments of the same species, and between tissues of the same compartment. For stem tissues, vertical concentration profiles were described using a versatile equation. Allometric equations were used to predict biomass and nutrient content of tree compartments based on tree dimensions. Broadly speaking, nutrient concentrations tended to be somewhat higher for oak compared with beech, but the amplitude and the direction of inter-species differences varied greatly, depending on the nutrient and the tree compartment. For both species, living branch nutrient concentrations tended to decrease with increasing branch diameter, except for Ca (oak) and Mg (beech). Nutrient concentrations were consistently higher in bark than in wood; this difference between tissues was quite pronounced for Ca, particularly in the case of oak. The biomass and nutrient content equations were used to investigate the effects of tree species and harvesting regime on nutrient exports at harvesting. For equivalent harvesting scenarios, beech was found to induce higher Mg exports than oak, and inversely for Ca. Assuming stand clear cutting, complete tree harvesting would increase average nutrient exports from 65% (Ca) to 162% (P) compared with a stem-only harvesting scenario. These results provide valuable information in the current context of the more intensive utilization of forest products.

Keyword(s): Belgium (MeSH) ; Biomass (MeSH) ; Calcium Compounds: analysis (MeSH) ; Environmental Monitoring: methods (MeSH) ; Environmental Remediation (MeSH) ; Fagus: physiology (MeSH) ; Food (MeSH) ; Forestry (MeSH) ; Magnesium Compounds: analysis (MeSH) ; Plant Components, Aerial: chemistry (MeSH) ; Quercus: physiology (MeSH) ; Species Specificity (MeSH) ; Calcium Compounds ; Magnesium Compounds ; J ; Biomass (auto) ; Nutrient content (auto) ; Quercus petraea (auto) ; Fagus sylvatica (auto) ; Mixed-species stand (auto)

Classification:

Note: Our research was funded by the Accord cadre - Recherche et Vulgarisation Forestieres project (Walloon Region, Regional Ministry of Agriculture, DNF). We wish to thank Engineer A. Barjasse, and the local forester A. Laboureix for giving us access to the site. Field work and sample preparation were carried out by F. Plume, F. Hardy, S. Genevrois, B. Pirard, H. Tricoli and A. Vanacker, and chemical analyses were performed by K. Henin and L. Gerlache. We are also grateful to the editor and the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions for earlier versions of the manuscript.

Research Program(s):
  1. Terrestrische Umwelt (P24)

Appears in the scientific report 2010
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > IBG > IBG-3
Workflow collections > Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2012-11-13, last modified 2019-06-25



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)