| 001 | 11691 | ||
| 005 | 20190625111432.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 pmid |a pmid:20231032 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 DOI |a 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.040 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 WOS |a WOS:000277109600001 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:21804894 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a PreJuSER-11691 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 333.7 |
| 084 | _ | _ | |2 WoS |a Environmental Sciences |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a André, F. |b 0 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB85547 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Biomass and nutrient content of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stem and branches in a mixed stand in southern Belgium |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |b Elsevier Science |c 2010 |
| 300 | _ | _ | |a 2285 - 2294 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 440 | _ | 0 | |a Science of the Total Environment |x 0048-9697 |0 5445 |y 11 |v 408 |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a Our research was funded by the Accord cadre - Recherche et Vulgarisation Forestieres project (Walloon Region, Regional Ministry of Agriculture, DNF). We wish to thank Engineer A. Barjasse, and the local forester A. Laboureix for giving us access to the site. Field work and sample preparation were carried out by F. Plume, F. Hardy, S. Genevrois, B. Pirard, H. Tricoli and A. Vanacker, and chemical analyses were performed by K. Henin and L. Gerlache. We are also grateful to the editor and the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions for earlier versions of the manuscript. |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Accurate estimates of the amounts of nutrients immobilised in the organs and tissues of different tree species are of prime importance to make appropriate tree species selection and determine the harvesting regime that will ensure forest sustainability. Sixteen sessile oaks (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) (64-129years; stem diameters: 17-57cm) and twelve beeches (Fagus sylvatica L.) (43-86years; stem diameters: 9-50cm) were destructively sampled from a mixed stand located on an acid brown soil in southern Belgium. Statistical models were developed to investigate the differences in nutrient concentrations between tree species, between aboveground tree compartments of the same species, and between tissues of the same compartment. For stem tissues, vertical concentration profiles were described using a versatile equation. Allometric equations were used to predict biomass and nutrient content of tree compartments based on tree dimensions. Broadly speaking, nutrient concentrations tended to be somewhat higher for oak compared with beech, but the amplitude and the direction of inter-species differences varied greatly, depending on the nutrient and the tree compartment. For both species, living branch nutrient concentrations tended to decrease with increasing branch diameter, except for Ca (oak) and Mg (beech). Nutrient concentrations were consistently higher in bark than in wood; this difference between tissues was quite pronounced for Ca, particularly in the case of oak. The biomass and nutrient content equations were used to investigate the effects of tree species and harvesting regime on nutrient exports at harvesting. For equivalent harvesting scenarios, beech was found to induce higher Mg exports than oak, and inversely for Ca. Assuming stand clear cutting, complete tree harvesting would increase average nutrient exports from 65% (Ca) to 162% (P) compared with a stem-only harvesting scenario. These results provide valuable information in the current context of the more intensive utilization of forest products. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a Terrestrische Umwelt |c P24 |2 G:(DE-HGF) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407 |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Belgium |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Biomass |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Calcium Compounds: analysis |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Environmental Monitoring: methods |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Environmental Remediation |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Fagus: physiology |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Food |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Forestry |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Magnesium Compounds: analysis |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Plant Components, Aerial: chemistry |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Quercus: physiology |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Species Specificity |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |0 0 |2 NLM Chemicals |a Calcium Compounds |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |0 0 |2 NLM Chemicals |a Magnesium Compounds |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a J |2 WoSType |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a Biomass |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a Nutrient content |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a Quercus petraea |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a Fagus sylvatica |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a Mixed-species stand |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Jonard, M. |b 1 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ponette, Q. |b 2 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.040 |g Vol. 408, p. 2285 - 2294 |p 2285 - 2294 |q 408<2285 - 2294 |0 PERI:(DE-600)1498726-0 |t The @science of the total environment |v 408 |y 2010 |x 0048-9697 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:11691 |p VDB |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |k P24 |v Terrestrische Umwelt |l Terrestrische Umwelt |b Erde und Umwelt |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2010 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010 |a JCR/ISI refereed |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |k ICG-4 |l Agrosphäre |d 31.10.2010 |g ICG |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 |x 1 |
| 970 | _ | _ | |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)122989 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a ConvertedRecord |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|
Gast ::