000136943 001__ 136943
000136943 005__ 20210129211908.0
000136943 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.092
000136943 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0048-9697
000136943 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-1026
000136943 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000330491600003
000136943 037__ $$aFZJ-2013-03465
000136943 082__ $$a333.7
000136943 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156216$$aEngelhardt, I.$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000136943 245__ $$aQuantification of long-term wastewater fluxes at the surface water/groundwater-interface: An integrative model perspective using stable isotopes and acesulfame
000136943 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2014
000136943 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1424246206_8543
000136943 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000136943 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000136943 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000136943 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000136943 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000136943 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000136943 520__ $$aThe suitability of acesulfame to trace wastewater-related surface water fluxes from streams into the hyporheic and riparian zones over long-term periods was investigated. The transport behavior of acesulfame was compared with the transport of water stable isotopes (δ18O or δ2H). A calibrated model based on a joint inversion of temperature, acesulfame, and piezometric pressure heads was employed in a model validation using data sets of acesulfame and water stable isotopes collected over 5 months in a stream and groundwater. The spatial distribution of fresh water within the groundwater resulting from surface water infiltration was estimated by computing groundwater ages and compared with the predicted acesulfame plume obtained after 153 day simulation time. Both, surface water ratios calculated with a mixing equation from water stable isotopes and simulated acesulfame mass fluxes, were investigated for their ability to estimate the contribution of wastewater-related surface water inflow within groundwater. The results of this study point to limitations for the application of acesulfame to trace surface water–groundwater interactions properly. Acesulfame completely missed the wastewater-related surface water volumes that still remained in the hyporheic zone under stream-gaining conditions. In contrast, under stream-losing conditions, which developed after periods of stagnating hydraulic exchange, acesulfame based predictions lead to an overestimation of the surface water volume of up to 25% in the riparian zone. If slow seepage velocities prevail a proportion of acesulfame might be stored in smaller pores, while when released under fast flowing water conditions it will travel further downstream with the groundwater flow direction. Therefore, under such conditions acesulfame can be a less-ideal tracer in the hyporheic and riparian zones and additional monitoring with other environmental tracers such as water stable isotopes is highly recommended.
000136943 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$a246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies (POF2-246)$$cPOF2-246$$fPOF II$$x0
000136943 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000136943 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBarth, J. A. C.$$b1
000136943 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, R.$$b2$$ufzj
000136943 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchulz, M.$$b3
000136943 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTernes, A.$$b4
000136943 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchüth, C.$$b5
000136943 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avan Geldern, R.$$b6
000136943 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498726-0$$a10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.092$$gVol. 466-467, p. 16 - 25$$p16 - 25$$tThe @science of the total environment$$v466-467$$x0048-9697$$y2014
000136943 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/136943/files/FZJ-2013-03465.pdf$$yRestricted
000136943 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:136943$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000136943 9141_ $$y2014
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000136943 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000136943 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156216$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000136943 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b2$$kFZJ
000136943 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000136943 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vModelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies$$x0
000136943 920__ $$lyes
000136943 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000136943 980__ $$ajournal
000136943 980__ $$aVDB
000136943 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000136943 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED