Journal Article PreJuSER-16936

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
The dependence of soil H2 uptake on temperature and moisture: a reanalysis of laboratory data

 ;

2011
Wiley-Blackwell Oxford [u.a.]

Tellus / B 63, 1040 - 1051 () [10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00581.x]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: In the past two types of laboratory experiments have been employed to determine the dependence of H2 uptake by soils on temperature and moisture: Head space and flow experiments. The former actually measure the rate constant of the H2 removal from the head space, kH, the latter the uptake rate of H2, UH2, both caused by a given volume of soil. From an analytical solution of the diffusion equation in the soil we derive a mathematical relation between kH and ks, the desired uptake rate constant of H2 in soil. Another equation relates UH2 with ks. Both types of experiments actually determine the product of ks with Θa, the air-filled pore volume fraction. ks.Θa for eolian sand and loess loam show zero uptake at very low and high moisture contents and a well defined maximum in between. Unlike soil moisture which also acts on the soil properties, the soil temperature, T, acts essentially on the enzyme activity only. Thus ks(T) is directly proportional to kH(T) or UH2(T) and the data of all experiments can be superimposed by scaling. The resulting average ks(T) shows a broad maximum around 30◦C with zero uptake below −20◦C and above 80◦C.


Note: Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Troposphäre (IEK-8)
Research Program(s):
  1. Atmosphäre und Klima (P23)

Appears in the scientific report 2011
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > ICE > ICE-3
Workflow collections > Public records
IEK > IEK-8
Publications database

 Record created 2012-11-13, last modified 2024-07-09



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)