000017016 001__ 17016
000017016 005__ 20200702121605.0
000017016 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:10342083
000017016 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1007/s00767-011-0169-6
000017016 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000294471600004
000017016 037__ $$aPreJuSER-17016
000017016 041__ $$aeng
000017016 082__ $$a690
000017016 084__ $$2WoS$$aEnvironmental Sciences
000017016 084__ $$2WoS$$aWater Resources
000017016 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB4997$$aWendland, F.$$b0$$uFZJ
000017016 245__ $$aA conceptual hydrogeological model for evaluating residence times in Hessen
000017016 260__ $$aBerlin$$bSpringer$$c2011
000017016 300__ $$a163 - 176
000017016 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000017016 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000017016 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000017016 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000017016 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000017016 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000017016 440_0 $$06316$$aGrundwasser$$v16$$x1430-483X$$y3
000017016 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000017016 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000017016 520__ $$aThe association between long-term use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and bone mineral density (BMD) has been controversial, as seen in three case-control studies in New Zealand, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. In the present case-controlled study of BMD, a group of 67 Chinese women who had used DMPA from 5-15 years was compared with 218 women of the same age range who had not used any steroidal hormones. DMPA users were found to have a significantly lower BMD at lumbar vertebra (L2-4) (0.93 g/cm2), neck of femur (0.69 g/cm2), trochanter (0.59 g/cm2), and Ward's triangle (0.58 g/cm2), as compared with the control group, whose corresponding BMD values were 1.03 g/cm2, 0.83 g/cm2, 0.71 g/cm2, and 0.78 g/cm2, respectively (p < 0.001). The average percentage of bone loss per year was estimated to be 1.1% in L2-4, 2.3% in neck of femur, 2.4% in trochanter, and 3.5% in Ward's triangle. The percentage of bone loss in L2-4 was found to be more pronounced with age. This study provided information that the use of DMPA in a Chinese group for > 5 years in associated with bone loss, and a prospective study is needed to confirm these data, which are different from two case-control studies.
000017016 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000017016 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAbsorptiometry, Photon
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAge Factors
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAmenorrhea
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aBody Mass Index
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aBone Density: drug effects
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aBone Resorption: etiology
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCalcium: metabolism
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCase-Control Studies
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aChina
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aContraceptive Agents, Female: pharmacology
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemale
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemur: physiopathology
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aLumbar Vertebrae: physiopathology
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMedroxyprogesterone Acetate: pharmacology
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMiddle Aged
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aQuestionnaires
000017016 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aRegression Analysis
000017016 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aContraceptive Agents, Female
000017016 650_7 $$071-58-9$$2NLM Chemicals$$aMedroxyprogesterone Acetate
000017016 650_7 $$07440-70-2$$2NLM Chemicals$$aCalcium
000017016 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000017016 65320 $$2Author$$aConceptual hydrogeological model
000017016 65320 $$2Author$$aResidence times
000017016 65320 $$2Author$$aEU-WFD
000017016 65320 $$2Author$$aLarge-scale model
000017016 65320 $$2Author$$aHessen
000017016 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBerthold, G.$$b1
000017016 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFritsche, J.-G.$$b2
000017016 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)141774$$aHerrmann, F.$$b3$$uFZJ
000017016 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB4996$$aKunkel, R.$$b4$$uFZJ
000017016 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVoigt, H.-J.$$b5
000017016 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, H.$$b6$$uFZJ
000017016 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1481438-9$$a10.1007/s00767-011-0169-6$$gVol. 16, p. 163 - 176$$p163 - 176$$q16<163 - 176$$tGrundwasser$$v16$$x1430-483X$$y2011
000017016 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00767-011-0169-6
000017016 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:17016$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment
000017016 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000017016 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000017016 9141_ $$y2011
000017016 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0020$$aNo peer review
000017016 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$gIBG$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000017016 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)131392
000017016 980__ $$aVDB
000017016 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000017016 980__ $$ajournal
000017016 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000017016 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED