Journal Article PreJuSER-17110

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Inter-laboratory comparison of oxygen isotope compositions from biogenic silica

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2011
Elsevier New York, NY [u.a.]

Geochimica et cosmochimica acta 75, 7242 - 7256 () [10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.011]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Several techniques have been introduced in the last decades for the dehydration and release of O-2 from biogenic silica (opal-A) for oxygen-isotope analysis. However, only one silica standard is universally available: a quartz standard (NBS28) distributed by the IAEA, Vienna. Hence, there is a need for biogenic silica working standards. This paper compares the existing methods of oxygen-isotope analyses of opal-A and aims to characterize additional possible working standards to calibrate the delta O-18 values of biogenic silica. For this purpose, an inter-laboratory comparison was organized. Six potential working standard materials were analysed repeatedly against NBS28 by eight participating laboratories using their specific analytical methods. The materials cover a wide range of delta O-18 values (+23 to +43 parts per thousand) and include diatoms (marine, lacustrine), phytoliths and synthetically-produced hydrous silica. To characterize the proposed standards, chemical analyses and imaging by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were also performed. Despite procedural differences at each laboratory, all methods are in reasonable agreement with a standard deviation (SD) for delta O-18 values between 0.3 parts per thousand and 0.9 parts per thousand (1 sigma). Based on the results, we propose four additional biogenic silica working standards (PS1772-8: 42.8 parts per thousand; BFC: 29.0 parts per thousand; MSG60: 37.0 parts per thousand; G95-25-CL leaves: 36.6 parts per thousand) for delta O-18 analyses, available on request through the relevant laboratories. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keyword(s): J


Note: This work was part of a Ph.D. research project funded by the German Research Foundation with the research grants DFG Me 3266-1-1 and 3266-1-2. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all technical staff and laboratory assistants involved in the analyses including Kim Law and Lisa Munro (UWO), Irena Brailovski (WIS) and Franz Leistner (FZJ), Lutz Schoenicke and Cindy Springer (AWI). In addition, we thank Helga Kemnitz and Rudolph Naumann from the German Research Center for Geosciences for their SEM and XRD support, respectively. Funding for GEAS was provided by a NERC postdoctoral fellowship award (NE/F012969/1). The research contributions of EAW and FJL were supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Agrosphäre (IBG-3)
Research Program(s):
  1. Terrestrische Umwelt (P24)

Appears in the scientific report 2011
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > IBG > IBG-3
Workflow collections > Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2012-11-13, last modified 2020-07-02



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)