001     17110
005     20200702121607.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.011
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000296579600031
024 7 _ |a altmetric:8101096
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-17110
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Geochemistry & Geophysics
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Chapligin, B.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Inter-laboratory comparison of oxygen isotope compositions from biogenic silica
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|b Elsevier
|c 2011
300 _ _ |a 7242 - 7256
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |0 10821
|a Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
|v 75
|x 0016-7037
|y 22
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
500 _ _ |a This work was part of a Ph.D. research project funded by the German Research Foundation with the research grants DFG Me 3266-1-1 and 3266-1-2. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all technical staff and laboratory assistants involved in the analyses including Kim Law and Lisa Munro (UWO), Irena Brailovski (WIS) and Franz Leistner (FZJ), Lutz Schoenicke and Cindy Springer (AWI). In addition, we thank Helga Kemnitz and Rudolph Naumann from the German Research Center for Geosciences for their SEM and XRD support, respectively. Funding for GEAS was provided by a NERC postdoctoral fellowship award (NE/F012969/1). The research contributions of EAW and FJL were supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
520 _ _ |a Several techniques have been introduced in the last decades for the dehydration and release of O-2 from biogenic silica (opal-A) for oxygen-isotope analysis. However, only one silica standard is universally available: a quartz standard (NBS28) distributed by the IAEA, Vienna. Hence, there is a need for biogenic silica working standards. This paper compares the existing methods of oxygen-isotope analyses of opal-A and aims to characterize additional possible working standards to calibrate the delta O-18 values of biogenic silica. For this purpose, an inter-laboratory comparison was organized. Six potential working standard materials were analysed repeatedly against NBS28 by eight participating laboratories using their specific analytical methods. The materials cover a wide range of delta O-18 values (+23 to +43 parts per thousand) and include diatoms (marine, lacustrine), phytoliths and synthetically-produced hydrous silica. To characterize the proposed standards, chemical analyses and imaging by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were also performed. Despite procedural differences at each laboratory, all methods are in reasonable agreement with a standard deviation (SD) for delta O-18 values between 0.3 parts per thousand and 0.9 parts per thousand (1 sigma). Based on the results, we propose four additional biogenic silica working standards (PS1772-8: 42.8 parts per thousand; BFC: 29.0 parts per thousand; MSG60: 37.0 parts per thousand; G95-25-CL leaves: 36.6 parts per thousand) for delta O-18 analyses, available on request through the relevant laboratories. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |2 WoSType
|a J
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Leng, M.J.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Webb, E.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Alexandre, A.
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Dodd, J.P.
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Ijiri, A.
|b 5
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129567
|a Lücke, A.
|b 6
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Shemesh, A.
|b 7
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Abelmann, A.
|b 8
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Herzschuh, U.
|b 9
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Longstaffe, F.J.
|b 10
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Meyer, H.
|b 11
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Moschen, R.
|b 12
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Okazaki, Y.
|b 13
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Rees, N.H.
|b 14
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sharp, Z.D.
|b 15
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sloane, H.J.
|b 16
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sonzogni, C.
|b 17
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Swann, G.E.A.
|b 18
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sylvestre, F.
|b 19
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Tyler, J.T.
|b 20
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Yam, R.
|b 21
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1483679-8
|a 10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.011
|g Vol. 75, p. 7242 - 7256
|p 7242 - 7256
|q 75<7242 - 7256
|t Geochimica et cosmochimica acta
|v 75
|x 0016-7037
|y 2011
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.011
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:17110
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Addenda
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2011
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|g IBG
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)131502
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21