% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wolf:201767,
author = {Wolf, Sharon Grayer and Houben, Lothar and Elbaum, Michael},
title = {{C}ryo-scanning transmission electron tomography of
vitrified cells},
journal = {Nature methods},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
issn = {1548-7105},
address = {London [u.a.] Nature Publishing Group},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-04061},
pages = {423 - 428},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Cryo-electron tomography (CET) of fully hydrated, vitrified
biological specimens has emerged as a vital tool for
biological research. For cellular studies, the conventional
imaging modality of transmission electron microscopy places
stringent constraints on sample thickness because of its
dependence on phase coherence for contrast generation. Here
we demonstrate the feasibility of using scanning
transmission electron microscopy for cryo-tomography of
unstained vitrified specimens (CSTET). We compare CSTET and
CET for the imaging of whole bacteria and human tissue
culture cells, finding favorable contrast and detail in the
CSTET reconstructions. Particularly at high sample tilts,
the CSTET signals contain more informative data than
energy-filtered CET phase contrast images, resulting in
improved depth resolution. Careful control over dose
delivery permits relatively high cumulative exposures before
the onset of observable beam damage. The increase in
acceptable specimen thickness broadens the applicability of
electron cryo-tomography.},
cin = {PGI-5},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-5-20110106},
pnm = {42G - Peter Grünberg-Centre (PG-C) (POF2-42G41)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-42G41},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000333749900025},
pubmed = {pmid:24531421},
doi = {10.1038/nmeth.2842},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/201767},
}