| Journal Article | FZJ-2015-06054 |
2015
MIT Press
Cambridge, Mass.
This record in other databases:
Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1162/NECO_a_00775
Abstract: We compare an entropy estimator Hz recently discussed by Zhang (2012) with two estimators, H1 and H2, introduced by Grassberger (2003) and Schürmann (2004). We prove the identity Hz ≡ H1, which has not been taken into account by Zhang (2012). Then we prove that the systematic error (bias) of H1 is less than or equal to the bias of the ordinary likelihood (or plug-in) estimator of entropy. Finally, by numerical simulation, we verify that for the most interesting regime of small sample estimation and large event spaces, the estimator H2 has a significantly smaller statistical error than Hz.
|
The record appears in these collections: |