001     279314
005     20240712084526.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1063/1.4936616
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0021-8979
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0148-6349
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1089-7550
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000369918100034
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/17054
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2015-07329
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |a Fink, T.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)151151
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Interplay between crystallinity profiles and the performance of microcrystalline thin-film silicon solar cells studied by in-situ Raman spectroscopy
260 _ _ |a Melville, NY
|c 2015
|b American Inst. of Physics
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1454328833_19496
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The intrinsic microcrystalline absorber layer growth in thin-filmsilicon solar-cells is investigated by in-situ Raman spectroscopy during plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In-situ Raman spectroscopy enables a detailed study of the correlation between the process settings, the evolution of the Raman crystallinity in growth direction, and the photovoltaic parameters η(solar cell conversion efficiency), JSC (short circuit current density), FF (fill factor), and VOC (open circuit voltage). Raman spectra were taken every 7 nm of the absorber layer growth depending on the process settings. The Raman crystallinity of growing microcrystalline silicon was determined with an absolute error of approximately ±5% for total absorber layer thicknesses >50 nm. Due to this high accuracy, inherent drifts of the Raman crystallinity profiles are resolvable for almost the entire absorber layer deposition. For constant process settings and optimized solar celldevice efficiency Raman crystallinity increases during the absorber layer growth. To compensate the inhomogeneous absorber layer growth process settings were adjusted. As a result, absorber layers with a constant Raman crystallinity profile — as observed in-situ — were deposited.Solar cells with those absorber layers show a strongly enhanced conversion efficiency by ∼0.5% absolute. However, the highest FF, VOC, and JSC were detected for solar cells with different Raman crystallinity profiles. In particular, fill factors of 74.5% were observed for solar cells with decreasing Raman crystallinity during the later absorber layer growth. In contrast, intrinsic layers with favorable JSC are obtained for constant and increasing Raman crystallinity profiles. Therefore, monitoring the evolution of the Raman crystallinity in-situ provides sufficient information for an optimization of the photovoltaic parameters with surpassing depth resolution.
536 _ _ |a 121 - Solar cells of the next generation (POF3-121)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-121
|c POF3-121
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406
|x 1
|c HITEC-20170406
|a HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Muthmann, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130271
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Mück, A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130272
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Gordijn, A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130242
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Carius, R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130225
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Meier, Matthias
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130830
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1063/1.4936616
|g Vol. 118, no. 21, p. 215304 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1476463-5
|n 21
|p 215304 -
|t Journal of applied physics
|v 118
|y 2015
|x 1089-7550
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/279314/files/1.4936616.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/279314/files/1.4936616.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/279314/files/1.4936616.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-700
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/279314/files/1.4936616.jpg?subformat=icon-700
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/279314/files/1.4936616.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:279314
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151151
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130271
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130272
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130242
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130225
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130830
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Erneuerbare Energien
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-121
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Solar cells of the next generation
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J APPL PHYS : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013
|k IEK-5
|l Photovoltaik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-3-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21