001     30959
005     20180210130640.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1021/es0206386
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000183973700023
024 7 _ |a 0013-936X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 1520-5851
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-30959
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 050
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Engineering, Environmental
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Environmental Sciences
100 1 _ |a Khalaf, M.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB3999
245 _ _ |a Comparison of Sorption Domains in Molecular Weight Fractions of a Soil Humic Acid Using Solid-State 19F NMR
260 _ _ |c 2003
|a Columbus, Ohio
|b American Chemical Society
300 _ _ |a 2855 - 2860
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Environmental Science and Technology
|x 0013-936X
|0 1865
|v 37
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Humic acid was fractionated into eight different molecular size components using ultrafiltration. Solid-state CPMAS C-13 NMR demonstrated that fractions larger than 100 000 Daltons were primarily aliphatic in character,while fractions smaller than 30 000 Daltons were predominantly aromatic in character. Solid-state F-19 NMR examination of the sorptive uptake of hexafluorobenzene (HFB) by HA and each of the fractions gave spectroscopic evidence for the existence of at least three sorption sites in the smaller molecular size fractions, while two predominant sorption sites could be established in the larger molecular size fractions. Sorbed HFB displayed higher mobility in the smaller, more aromatic fractions while HFB in the larger, more aliphatic fractions displayed lower mobility. The relative mobilities of HFB in each sorption domain suggest that the rigid domain may be composed of aliphatic carbon rather than aromatic carbon moieties. In larger size fractions, this domain may be the result of rigid, glassy regions composed of aliphatic molecules or side chains.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
700 1 _ |a Kohl, S.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Klumpp, E.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129484
700 1 _ |a Rice, J.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Tombácz, E.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1465132-4
|a 10.1021/es0206386
|g Vol. 37, p. 2855 - 2860
|p 2855 - 2860
|q 37<2855 - 2860
|t Environmental Science & Technology
|v 37
|x 0013-936X
|y 2003
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0206386
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:30959
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2003
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |k ICG-IV
|l Agrosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB50
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)30124
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21