Journal Article PreJuSER-56454

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2009
INFORMS Hanover, Md.

Transportation science 43, 395 - 406 () [10.1287/trsc.1090.0263]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Capacity estimation is an important tool for the design and dimensioning of pedestrian facilities. The literature contains different procedures and specifications that show considerable differences with respect to the estimated flow values. Moreover, new experimental data indicate a stepwise growth of capacity with width and thus challenge the validity of the specific flow concept. To resolve these differences, we experimentally studied the unidirectional pedestrian flow through bottlenecks under laboratory conditions. The time development of quantities such as individual velocities, density, and individual time gaps in bottlenecks of different widths is presented. The data show a linear growth of flow with width. The comparison of the results with experimental data from other authors indicates that the basic assumption of the capacity estimation for bottlenecks has to be revised. In contrast to most planning guidelines, our main result is that a jam occurs even if the incoming flow does not overstep the capacity defined by the maximum flow according to the fundamental diagram.

Keyword(s): J ; pedestrian flow (auto) ; traffic flow (auto) ; traffic and crowd dynamics (auto) ; capacity of bottlenecks (auto)


Note: Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC)
Research Program(s):
  1. Scientific Computing (P41)

Appears in the scientific report 2009
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Workflow collections > Public records
Institute Collections > JSC
Publications database

 Record created 2012-11-13, last modified 2018-02-11



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)