000807841 001__ 807841
000807841 005__ 20210129222737.0
000807841 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/brain/aww034
000807841 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0006-8950
000807841 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1460-2156
000807841 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000374234900009
000807841 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:6526620
000807841 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:27012489
000807841 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-02201
000807841 041__ $$aEnglish
000807841 082__ $$a610
000807841 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000807841 245__ $$aNew hope for ameliorating stroke-induced deficits?
000807841 260__ $$aOxford$$bOxford Univ. Press$$c2016
000807841 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000807841 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000807841 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1472453653_29055
000807841 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000807841 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000807841 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000807841 520__ $$aThis scientific commentary refers to ‘Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia’ by Meinzer et al. (doi:10.1093/brain/aww002).The overall decline in stroke mortality observed over the past decades is due to both a reduction in stroke incidence, primarily resulting from cardiovascular risk factor interventions, and substantial progress in the acute treatment of stroke (e.g. recanalization due to thrombolysis and thrombectomy, decompressive therapy) as well as patient care (stroke units) (Mozaffarian et al., 2016). These improvements (in particular among people older than 65 years) are mirrored, however, by an increasing number of stroke survivors, who are left with persistent neurological deficits. Despite intensive rehabilitation, at least in countries with well developed healthcare systems, many stroke survivors are left with motor, language, spatial or other neuropsychological sequelae, all of which result in reduced functional independence. Consequently, stroke is the leading cause of acquired long-term disability and globally produces immense health, social and economic burdens (Mozaffarian et al., 2016). While physiotherapy, language therapy and occupational therapy are widely accepted elements of rehabilitation medicine that aim to restore functioning and quality of life in those with physical disabilities or cognitive impairments, novel approaches to rehabilitation are urgently needed. Such therapies may comprise behavioural, pharmacological or technical approaches, the latter including the use of robotic devices as well as non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques [i.e. transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)]. In this issue of Brain, Meinzer and colleagues raise new hope for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia by showing that electrical stimulation of the motor cortex [sic!] enhances treatment outcomes (Meinzer et al., 2016).
000807841 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000807841 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000807841 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161406$$aGrefkes, Christian$$b1$$ufzj
000807841 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWeiss, Peter H.$$b2
000807841 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1474117-9$$a10.1093/brain/aww034$$gVol. 139, no. 4, p. 1002 - 1004$$n4$$p1002 - 1004$$tBrain$$v139$$x1460-2156$$y2016
000807841 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807841/files/1002.full.pdf$$yRestricted
000807841 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807841/files/1002.full.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000807841 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807841/files/1002.full.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000807841 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807841/files/1002.full.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000807841 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807841/files/1002.full.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000807841 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/807841/files/1002.full.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000807841 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:807841$$pVDB
000807841 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000807841 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161406$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000807841 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b2$$kFZJ
000807841 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000807841 9141_ $$y2016
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBRAIN : 2014
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0400$$2StatID$$aAllianz-Lizenz / DFG
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bBRAIN : 2014
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000807841 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000807841 920__ $$lyes
000807841 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000807841 980__ $$ajournal
000807841 980__ $$aVDB
000807841 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000807841 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406