Journal Article FZJ-2016-02303

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Development and Optimization of Porosity Measurement Techniques

 ;

2016
Elsevier Science Amsterdam [u.a.]

Ceramics international 42(2), 2861-2870 () [10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.015]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Different porosity measurement methods are investigated and compared to ascertain a relatively accurate and efficient method suitable for laboratory utilization. As model material Sr0.895Y0.07TiO3−δ (SYT) ceramic material, which is designed as anode substrate for planar solid oxide fuel cells, is studied. Seven batches with different porosity are investigated using image analysis method and Archimedean porosimetry, operating under different conditions, and compare with the results from mercury porosimetry. The experimental results reveal for these methods different accuracies of the true porosity for different porosity ranges.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Werkstoffstruktur und -eigenschaften (IEK-2)
Research Program(s):
  1. 111 - Efficient and Flexible Power Plants (POF3-111) (POF3-111)
  2. HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406) (HITEC-20170406)

Appears in the scientific report 2016
Database coverage:
Medline ; Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology ; Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; No Authors Fulltext ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Thomson Reuters Master Journal List ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > IMD > IMD-1
Workflow collections > Public records
IEK > IEK-2
Publications database

 Record created 2016-04-18, last modified 2024-07-11


Restricted:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)