% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Helias:834092,
author = {Helias, Moritz and Kühn, Tobias},
title = {{L}ocking of correlated neural activity to ongoing
oscillations},
journal = {PLoS Computational Biology},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
issn = {1553-7358},
address = {San Francisco, Calif.},
publisher = {Public Library of Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-04093},
pages = {e1005534},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Population-wide oscillations are ubiquitously observed in
mesoscopic signals of cortical activity. In these network
states a global oscillatory cycle modulates the propensity
of neurons to fire. Synchronous activation of neurons has
been hypothesized to be a separate channel of signal
processing information in the brain. A salient question is
therefore if and how oscillations interact with spike
synchrony and in how far these channels can be considered
separate. Experiments indeed showed that correlated spiking
co-modulates with the static firing rate and is also tightly
locked to the phase of beta-oscillations. While the
dependence of correlations on the mean rate is well
understood in feed-forward networks, it remains unclear why
and by which mechanisms correlations tightly lock to an
oscillatory cycle. We here demonstrate that such correlated
activation of pairs of neurons is qualitatively explained by
periodically-driven random networks. We identify the
mechanisms by which covariances depend on a driving periodic
stimulus. Mean-field theory combined with linear response
theory yields closed-form expressions for the
cyclostationary mean activities and pairwise zero-time-lag
covariances of binary recurrent random networks. Two
distinct mechanisms cause time-dependent covariances: the
modulation of the susceptibility of single neurons (via the
external input and network feedback) and the time-varying
variances of single unit activities. For some parameters,
the effectively inhibitory recurrent feedback leads to
resonant covariances even if mean activities show
non-resonant behavior. Our analytical results open the
question of time-modulated synchronous activity to a
quantitative analysis.},
cin = {INM-6 / IAS-6 / INM-10},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828 /
I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113},
pnm = {574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574) / 571 -
Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571) / HBP SGA1 - Human
Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270) / SMHB -
Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain
(HGF-SMHB-2013-2017) / Helmholtz Young Investigators Group
(HGF-YoungInvestigatorsGroup)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571 /
G:(EU-Grant)720270 / G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017 /
G:(DE-HGF)HGF-YoungInvestigatorsGroup},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000404565400013},
pubmed = {pmid:28604771},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005534},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/834092},
}