% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Barthel:837913,
author = {Barthel, Juri and Lentzen, Markus and Thust, Andreas},
title = {{R}esponse to the comment by {C}. {K}isielowsky, {H}.{A}.
{C}alderon, {F}.{R}. {C}hen, {S}. {H}elveg, {J}.{R}.
{J}inschek, {P}. {S}pecht, {D}. van {D}yck on the article
"{O}n the influence of the electron dose-rate on the {HRTEM}
{I}mage contrast" by {J}. {B}arthel, {M}. {L}entzen, {A}.
{T}hust},
journal = {Ultramicroscopy},
volume = {179},
issn = {0304-3991},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-06683},
pages = {113 - 115},
year = {2017},
abstract = {In a recent article [1] we examined the influence of the
applied electron dose rate on the magnitude of the image
contrast in high-resolution transmission electron microscopy
(HRTEM). We concluded that the magnitude of the image
contrast is not substantially affected by the applied
electron dose rate. This result is in obvious contradiction
to numerous earlier publications by Kisielowski and
coworkers [2–7], who commented our recent article due to
this contradiction. The present short communication is a
response to the comment of Kisielowski and coworkers on our
recent article, where we provide additional arguments
supporting our initial findings and conclusions on the
magnitude of the image contrast in HRTEM.},
cin = {ER-C-1 / ER-C-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-1-20170209 / I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-2-20170209},
pnm = {143 - Controlling Configuration-Based Phenomena (POF3-143)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-143},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000403985600016},
doi = {10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.004},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837913},
}