% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence % of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older. % Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or % “biber”. @ARTICLE{Barthel:837913, author = {Barthel, Juri and Lentzen, Markus and Thust, Andreas}, title = {{R}esponse to the comment by {C}. {K}isielowsky, {H}.{A}. {C}alderon, {F}.{R}. {C}hen, {S}. {H}elveg, {J}.{R}. {J}inschek, {P}. {S}pecht, {D}. van {D}yck on the article "{O}n the influence of the electron dose-rate on the {HRTEM} {I}mage contrast" by {J}. {B}arthel, {M}. {L}entzen, {A}. {T}hust}, journal = {Ultramicroscopy}, volume = {179}, issn = {0304-3991}, address = {Amsterdam}, publisher = {Elsevier Science}, reportid = {FZJ-2017-06683}, pages = {113 - 115}, year = {2017}, abstract = {In a recent article [1] we examined the influence of the applied electron dose rate on the magnitude of the image contrast in high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). We concluded that the magnitude of the image contrast is not substantially affected by the applied electron dose rate. This result is in obvious contradiction to numerous earlier publications by Kisielowski and coworkers [2–7], who commented our recent article due to this contradiction. The present short communication is a response to the comment of Kisielowski and coworkers on our recent article, where we provide additional arguments supporting our initial findings and conclusions on the magnitude of the image contrast in HRTEM.}, cin = {ER-C-1 / ER-C-2}, ddc = {570}, cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-1-20170209 / I:(DE-Juel1)ER-C-2-20170209}, pnm = {143 - Controlling Configuration-Based Phenomena (POF3-143)}, pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-143}, typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16}, UT = {WOS:000403985600016}, doi = {10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.004}, url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/837913}, }